There is more evidence of Morgan saying that he edged it than not so there you go. And TV replay were not clear at all.
Can you provide us with some first hand quotes from Morgan please?There is more evidence of Morgan saying that he edged it than not so there you go. And TV replay were not clear at all.
Plus he walked off without reviewing it. No mind reading skills needed after that.
You cannot go telling around batsman to be honest and then when they walk without any motive, tell them they were not out based on your interpretation of a stupid TV replay.
I don't need to because he walked FFS!! Which is better than any quotes.
3. He thought he'd been given lbw.I don't need to because he walked FFS!! Which is better than any quotes.
It's the others who are speculating based on nothing really. Plus Sky confirmed it ,so all evidence is one way right now.
See there are 2 possibilites even taking your hypothetical world(which i don't think it is) -
1)Either he was a Idiot who did not know he could review that, which is his fault. In which case there is no certainty too that it would have been overturned and "supposition and bullcrap" comes in.
2)He really edged it and believes it in which case it matters **** all what people are biasedly interpretating from the replays.
Which again comes under 1) He is a Idiot category :sigh:
Logic. Nowhere to be seen.
Where did that theory come from?
Inclined to agree, but, as I said in the match thread, would it have been overturned? Clearly hitting leg, but the ball did have over 2.5m to travel. IIRC a plumber NO decision was upheld in the WC because of that.
I think that was more down to Bowden being a moron tbf.
Don't think it was ever a "rule", was it? Just that Hawkeye supposedly gets less accurate predicting over longer distances.
Third ump today, isn't he? Just sayin'.
Well it has to by definition but it was still a rule. There is nothing magical about 2.5 vs. 2.6 or 2.4 - it's likely a progressive reduction in accuracy.
I think it's more to do with HawkEye not wanting to change too drastically how the game is played. The 2.5m rule is more because in cricket you almost never get given lbw when you advance down the pitch.
Whatever. Pretty sure it wasn't a law or playing condition of cricket tho.
World Cup 2011: ICC tweaks 2.5 metre DRS rule for 'consistency' | Cricket News | ICC Cricket World Cup 2011 | ESPN Cricinfo
Fair dos. Def not an error then:
I said the other day that, on the review of the day they do on SKY with Bob Willis, they said this on there that he thought he was out Lbw, there was some here say around the time about it by SKY but obviously they were put right. Morgan didn't walk as Cevno keeps saying, he waited for the umpire and then walked off.
