*Official* Match 17 - Canada v Pakistan

[Mr Casson]

Also, get off Bagai's back about the signalling from the dressing room. The guy doesn't even know which umpire to appeal to for a stumping, I doubt he's getting secret communications from inside the rooms.

 

[cricman]

He's Whining like Federer ... this is annoying, I didn't see no damn signal either

 

[Jono]

Haha he's calling for a reversal of the review because they looked to the dressing room.

STFU Ramiz. You're playing Canada. Earn your ****ing wickets properly

 

[Blaze 18]

How does it matter even if there was a signal ? The right decision was made, that is all that matters.

 

[cricman]

I still think Gunesekra got an edge

 

[Himannv]

Dont think its particularly sporting to get help from the dressing room tbh. Eitherways I dont think Canada were doing that really.

 

[cnerd123]

Where's John Davidson today?

34 runs knocked off, 151 to go. C'mon Canada!

 

[Mr Casson]

Dont think its particularly sporting to get help from the dressing room tbh. Eitherways I dont think Canada were doing that really.

That's it. Obviously you should not be able to get a signal from the dressing room because that would defeat the purpose of teams having only two chances to get the decision wrong. Teams would hardly ever make a mistake if the guys backstage were giving them clues.

But if the guy glances somewhere on the spur of the moment, he's hardly obtaining an advantage by deception. It was a glance, hardly enough time for him to lock onto someone over a hundred metres away.

 

[Blaze 18]

Haha, he's coming down the pitch every ball.

 

[cricman]

Harper is shook

 

[Nate]

Bagai. Anchor this son!

 

[FaaipDeOiad]

I think you're overestimating Pakistan here IMO.

Hey, it was paying like $1000. It was worth a shot.

 

[Prince EWS]

That's it. Obviously you should not be able to get a signal from the dressing room because that would defeat the purpose of teams having only two chances to get the decision wrong. Teams would hardly ever make a mistake if the guys backstage were giving them clues.

Players never making mistakes when reviewing would be awesome IMO. The only argument against reviewing everything is the time it'd take; if the dressing room can eliminate that problem it'd be great for the game.

 

[Athlai]

Bagai has a pretty remarkable batting record.

1766 @ 36.79 SR 64.80

Though if you only look at his record against Test playing teams it becomes
164 @ 12.61 SR 50.46

Serious minnow basher he is.

 

[Howe_zat]

They're not going to do this, are they? Canada are barely hanging on to their wickets, even the rate is becoming an issue.

 

[Howe_zat]

Bagai has a pretty remarkable batting record.

1766 @ 36.79 SR 64.80

Though if you only look at his record against Test playing teams it becomes
164 @ 12.61 SR 50.46

Serious minnow basher he is.

Give him a break!

 

[Jono]

Game on IMO

 

[GotSpin]

They're not going to do this, are they? Canada are barely hanging on to their wickets, even the rate is becoming an issue.

RR required is 4...

Where's Davidson btw?

 

[Jono]

Hey, it was paying like $1000. It was worth a shot.

Haha. More meant your confidence in Canada not getting close. I reckon it's 50-50 from here.

 

[Blaze 18]

Players never making mistakes when reviewing would be awesome IMO. The only argument against reviewing everything is the time it'd take; if the dressing room can eliminate that problem it'd be great for the game.

This. UDRS is there to eliminate errors, not to test the reviewing skills of players.