• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* South Africa in India

aussie

Hall of Fame Member
So does that mean that you could write off every other tour?
Of course not. But you can make an educated guess before teams make tours to tough conditions in recent years like AUS 96-2007, India vs Kumble/Harbhaja or SRI vs Murali/Vaas - whether the opposition has the tools batting or bowling wise to upset.


With regards to the IND 08 tour. It was fairly obvious long before that series began that AUS didn't have the tools to win with regards to bowling attack. So IND wins can't be rated as highly.

I mean England were never expected to be competitive in 05 either.
Well yes sometimes the unexpected happens like that series IND vs AUS 2001. SA vs AUS 52/53, IND vs AUS 2001, ENG VS SA 98. AUS vs WI 60/61, IND vs WI 2002. Where seemingly inferior teams step up unexpectedly. But those things dont always happen.

To be fair to ENG in 05, some did believe they had a team to win.
 

aussie

Hall of Fame Member
Just using your logic to dimiss the series
...
Your response is not not my logic, that yours all the way.

As for talking some sense now.. Any team will struggle with their regular 3 batsman missing and when its against World #2 team..... than it'll become even more tougher.
Most cases yes. But inversely one can argue this series is a good chance for INDs batting reserves to step up.

FYI.. i don't remember a match where Aus played without Ponting, Hayden n some other batsman during that period.
Although Saha would have never played. IND losing Dravid, Laxman & replacing with Vijay & Badrinath is comparable to:

- Aus losing M Waugh & Lehmann coming right in as replacement'

- S Waugh retiring young Clarke coming up circa 2004

- Ponting missing IND 04 & Katich taking over & doing well @ 3

- Post Ashes 05 when Martyn/Katich was dropepd & Hodge/Hussey coming in againts a strong SA team & doing well

- Langer going out & Jaques coming in

- Hayden retiring & Symonds being dropped young Hughes & Nroth coming againts SA in a similar # 1 vs # 2 clash like this current series & doing well.

Could me more, but aint able remember others ATM..
 

L Trumper

State Regular
It's hard not to appreciate the best team in the world :ph34r:
There is appreciation and there is mark nick.

I don't remember which odi but in one match watson got caught out on the mid on

Nicholas' response : " No no , now i feel really bad he is such a good batsman i don't want him to get out"
Thats cheerleading not appreciating.

In fairness Chappell, gilchrist are good. Benaud,Taylor are bearable. Heals did get a little better. But still when you are following sky and channel 9 regularly, difference is as big as watto's stride.
 

silentstriker

The Wheel is Forever
Wow, I can't believe how polluted this thread is. We have such an awesome game, and the thread is focused on some idiotic irrelevancies.
 

aussie

Hall of Fame Member
As far as aussie is concerned, any test Australia ever lost is because their team was in disarray and the opposition got lucky with conditions, umpiring, batting, bowling, fielding, weather, football, baseball and the President... 8-)
And as far as your are concerned everytime IND lost ESPECIALLY to AUS was because Ponting was always complaining as captain & all the grounds where affected by seasonal rainfall.
 

L Trumper

State Regular
I need to dig up some articles post Lord's Test in 2005.
English love criticizing their own short comings more than anyone else. So no need to dig up.
But I am pretty sure most people thought it'd be competitive. For every aus fan mcgrath injury is the only reason ENG won , for every ENG fan flintoff came to his own only in the 2nd test is the reason they lost first one so easily.
 

R_D

International Debutant
lol.. that is some achievement.. Are they really that poor today? I know Gavaskar talking about Tendulkar is almost equal to having to listen to Mark Nicholas about Shane Watson's muscles... :p
Na they haven't been that biased today but i was talking in general.. should've mentioned it.

There was one moment today.. made me laugh...
Tendulkar glided the ball through the gully region and Gavaskar said beautifully played or somthing along those lines and South African commentator... after watching the replay goes... ohh that looked like he almost meant to play that shot... :laugh:
 

Pothas

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Na they haven't been that biased today but i was talking in general.. should've mentioned it.

There was one moment today.. made me laugh...
Tendulkar glided the ball through the gully region and Gavaskar said beautifully played or somthing along those lines and South African commentator... after watching the replay goes... ohh that looked like he almost meant to play that shot... :laugh:
That was a lovely shot to be fair, Cullilan just chatting rubbish.

Sach has looked good today, that edge 5 minutes ago aside,
 

Dissector

International Debutant
Tendulkar passes 50 for the 100th time in tests; the first player to achieve this. If he can get his 46th hundred it will be a minor consolation in a dire test.
 

Pothas

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
God I know it has been said many times before but watching Harris is fairly painfull.
 

Xuhaib

International Coach
Vijay gone - he has now gotten starts virtually every single time he has played and failed to convert. This is a big problem at this level. Especially that shot - sweeping and trying to go for six?
welcome to the world of Umer Akmal.
 

R_D

International Debutant
That was a lovely shot to be fair, Cullilan just chatting rubbish.

Sach has looked good today, that edge 5 minutes ago aside,
Yea i know.. that was my point.. it was a beautiful shot but South African commentators comments were just laughable....

Badrinath goes... again Yuvi's test career has been revived.
 

Anil

Hall of Fame Member
it's the final line of resistance now, msd and srt...once they break through, the rest should be easy...
 

biased indian

International Coach
Although Saha would have never played. IND losing Dravid, Laxman & replacing with Vijay & Badrinath is comparable to:

- Aus losing M Waugh & Lehmann coming right in as replacement'

- S Waugh retiring young Clarke coming up circa 2004

- Ponting missing IND 04 & Katich taking over & doing well @ 3

- Post Ashes 05 when Martyn/Katich was dropepd & Hodge/Hussey coming in againts a strong SA team & doing well

- Langer going out & Jaques coming in

- Hayden retiring & Symonds being dropped young Hughes & Nroth coming againts SA in a similar # 1 vs # 2 clash like this current series & doing well.

Could me more, but aint able remember others ATM..
didn't want to respond but is very hard not to :dry:

india lost 2 players to injury where in your example is there 2 very good batsmen missing games due to injury.

people dropped is due to the fact that they where out of form while injury is different hope you know the difference :ph34r:
 

aussie

Hall of Fame Member
Wow, I can't believe how polluted this thread is. We have such an awesome game, and the thread is focused on some idiotic irrelevancies.
Oh so when poster Black_Warrior was bigging up IND 2008 series win vs AUS, it was fine to pollute the thread. But now that i arguing againts it, its "idiotic irrelevancies"?. Oh the double standard :laugh:

But yes i agree lets drop this & focus on this awesome game, that IND are facing an innings defeat in..
 

Top