Trinidad might have played only a few matches as a team, but the players have played a reasonable amount of 20/20 cricket during their careers so far, at various levels.....By the way, what do you expect of T&T, Eagles and Wayamba? From the stat sheets, I find that T&T are relative newcomers in T20 and have played few matches. Wayamba have a very strong bowling attack but the batting, dependent solely on Mahela, lacks striking power. Meanwhile, Eagles don't have any famous player (except Morne van Wyk and Ryan McLaren) and the stats are not even impressive, and were virtually written off by Cricinfo.
Can be kept quiet if the bowling is good.David Warner goes from 2 from 12 to 20 from 19. I was just wondering why he was so modest. In both T20 & T20I, he averages around 30, with a 140 strike rate.
I hope Victoria get absolutely belted, if that helps.Not sure how to feel here re:NSW, mixed feelings tbh.
By Nannes?I hope Victoria get absolutely belted, if that helps.
Why Nannes specifically?By Nannes?
He's definitely a better bowler in the longer form IMO, I don't think his batting really suits one format more than the other though. Probably suits limited overs stuff slightly more if anything, despite what his averages will tell you.It will be interesting to see how Henriques goes in this tournament, people talk him up a lot but he hasn't done a lot so far. Is he thought of as being better at the longer game or shorter batting-wise?
Just for the sake of irony.Why Nannes specifically?
I'd probably rather Nannes have a shocker as well tbh, for a couple of reasons.Just for the sake of irony.
Lol, true enough.I'd probably rather Nannes have a shocker as well tbh, for a couple of reasons.
1. The more Victorians who fail, the better.
2. If they got Nannes'd it'd give them a pretty fair excuse to have a right old whinge about it.