...Will still be too cold for the cotton-wool Indian journos. I think we all know what the headlines are going to be if India loses.
"Chilly conditions trip up mighty India".
India 162 for 8, Kiwis lose first wicketAware that Indians were short on match practice, the Kiwi captain’s decision was fully supported by his bowlers, who managed to get wickets on regular intervals as Indian batsmen found it tough to adjust to the chilly conditions.
Yeah, I remember that. It was done with the intention of pointing out the double standards of the Aussies in crying over the m word. Different cultures, different connotations etc. However I think Kumble either took back the complaint or didn't make it officially at all to indicate to Ponting how Sydney should have been handled by them.Hmm I do remember that. Bastard has stronger connotations in India and to Indian people, I think that's what all the furore was about (as it often in between India and Australia). Bastard is a throwaway term here, used quite frequently whereas IIRC it's a strong insult over there.
Was that in a send off though? Or in general play? Can't remember much about it, myself.
Don't want to derail the thread, but as was pointed out at the time that the comparison falls apart when you factor in that Harbi was made culturally aware of the significance of the term by Symonds in private when he used it for the first time in India. The whole Hogg thing was just pure pettiness and that's why I imagine Kumble withdrew the complaint, not because he was trying to teach us all a lesson.Yeah, I remember that. It was done with the intention of pointing out the double standards of the Aussies in crying over the m word. Different cultures, different connotations etc. However I think Kumble either took back the complaint or didn't make it officially at all to indicate to Ponting how Sydney should have been handled by them.
Great to see mod himself hijack it.Don't want to derail the thread, but as was pointed out at the time that the comparison falls apart when you factor in that Harbi was made culturally aware of the significance of the term by Symonds in private when he used it for the first time in India. The whole Hogg thing was just pure pettiness and that's why I imagine Kumble withdrew the complaint, not because he was trying to teach us all a lesson.
I think the point was that the Aussies had an idea that most of the sledging they dish out is culturally unacceptable to the Indians, yet they've been carrying on with it anyway all the time without consideration to how insulting the opponents consider it. So it was more of a 'screw you' reaction. You can't expect your opponents to lay off a set of insults if you don't play by the rules yourself. Unless of course, you think the Aussies had no idea some their sledges would be culturally unacceptable to the Indians, which I consider improbable given the number of tour exchanges the teams have had this decade alone.Don't want to derail the thread, but as was pointed out at the time that the comparison falls apart when you factor in that Harbi was made culturally aware of the significance of the term by Symonds in private when he used it for the first time in India. The whole Hogg thing was just pure pettiness and that's why I imagine Kumble withdrew the complaint, not because he was trying to teach us all a lesson.
Yeah, that was clearly the Indian point of view and it's one that's understandable though what the Aussies knew is up for debate. From an Australian point of view they obviously think certain things are acceptable and certain things aren't and that's where most cultures are going to clash and it's not anything new. The conflict begins when one or both sides refuse to educate and acknowledge the other culture -back in the 60s Benaud made a specific request from the govt. before going to the subcontinent that he be briefed on the cultures and customs of the people in India and Pakistan in order not to offend and to be diplomatic when representing Australia. Some of the current captains could learn a great deal from the old man.I think the point was that the Aussies had an idea that most of the sledging they dish out is culturally unacceptable to the Indians, yet they've been carrying on with it anyway all the time without consideration to how insulting the opponents consider it. So it was more of a 'screw you' reaction. You can't expect your opponents to lay off a set of insults if you don't play by the rules yourself. Unless of course, you think the Aussies had no idea some their sledges would be culturally unacceptable to the Indians, which I consider improbable given the number of tour exchanges the teams have had this decade alone.
Yeah, commercialisation of cricket doesn't help too. The teams of the decade past are more willing to get out their hotels and experience the host countries first hand, compared to the 80s and early 90s. However it does no good that the occasions they do venture out are spent mainly on fulfilling commercial obligations, making public appearances for their sponsors, ad and photoshoots etc. The instances of joint team dinners, for example, are hard to come across nowadays. In a sense, I'm glad the IPL exists. Players from different countries playing for the same team in the IPL are unlikely to step on each others toes outside the IPL.Yeah, that was clearly the Indian point of view and it's one that's understandable though what the Aussies knew is up for debate. From an Australian point of view they obviously think certain things are acceptable and certain things aren't and that's where most cultures are going to clash and it's not anything new. The conflict begins when one or both sides refuse to educate and acknowledge the other culture -back in the 60s Benaud made a specific request from the govt. before going to the subcontinent that he be briefed on the cultures and customs of the people in India and Pakistan in order not to offend and to be diplomatic when representing Australia. Some of the current captains could learn a great deal from the old man.
Haa, thought Ian Butler was another condemed Kiwi bowler to the injury section.
Was he bowling at good pace??
I'm loving the New Zealand limited overs side at the moment...so many multi-skilled players coming through.
I'm a sooth-****ing-sayer.
bowling in the high 130's to low 140's. Not bad for someone who was told he will never bowl again.
He has gotta be in the ODI team, drop Southee
No, he wasn't. I think he is just deceptively fast.Was he bowling that fast, I only managed to catch a few overs, must of been bowling a lot of slower balls.