steds
Hall of Fame Member
****.Id give him another
****.Id give him another
Nice angling ...If England lose this Test then the curious (or maybe not so much) terrible record of England with Flintoff in the side continues.
That England's record with Flintoff in the side was disproportionately poor.What hadnt you noticed?
http://www.cricketweb.net/forum/showpost.php?p=1495139&postcount=2205That England's record with Flintoff in the side was disproportionately poor.
Name Games Played in Won Games Played in Not Won % Games Played Won
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Harmison 28 27 51%
Strauss 21 22 48.8%
Vaughan 35 37 48.6%
Trescothick 37 39 48.6%
Hoggard 31 34 47.7%
Anderson 9 11 45%
Flintoff 27 40 40.3%
Bell 12 20 37.5%
Nothing wrong with a fielder earning a wicket though.Damn. Hate it when wickets fall to Long-Hops. ABdeV definately caught that one.
He must be wondering why he bothered. wtf was the point of that particular shot Bell? he really is as thick as they come at times.Nice catch, interesting to see Anderson showed more ticker than most of the England top order.
Do you really see England adding another 140?Ripper of a catch my inning and 30run defeat prediction is looking good.
Game is over. Needs to try and beat Astles recordFreddie time. At least it won't be boring.
Or long.Freddie time. At least it won't be boring.
For someone who pays so much attention to detail to your posts, I'm amazed that you can't spell "definitely".Damn. Hate it when wickets fall to Long-Hops. ABdeV definately caught that one.
I dunno. There's plenty to choose from even at Headingley - SA in 2003, India in 2002, innings defeat to Aus in 1997, India in 1986, NZ in 1983. Seems we're either mildly heroic or completely dire at this ground, with very little in between.Where does this one rank in the most embarrassing Test defeats list, then?