Jakester1288
International Regular
I'd say Simon Jones when he's fit.
But only with the occasional freak ball. Simon Jones is more connsistant, which is much more important test match conditions.You have to go for Jimmy when the ball is swinging, he can be unplayable. Otherwise Simon Jones gives you an option with the old ball with his reverse swing. So I would play him in seamer-unfriendly conditions.
Freak balls get set batsman out, which is important. And although Jones' actual bowling is more consistent, he is a liability when it come to injuries.But only with the occasional freak ball. Simon Jones is more connsistant, which is much more important test match conditions.
And that doesn't apply to Jones either?!You have to go for Jimmy when the ball is swinging, he can be unplayable.
I don't know that he's more consistent, not in terms of accuracy and keeping the run-rate down - both Jones and Anderson are generally fairly wayward. The difference is, there have seemed to date to be far more circumstances under which Jones can produce the wicket-taking deliveries than Anderson can.But only with the occasional freak ball. Simon Jones is more connsistant, which is much more important test match conditions.
My thoughts. Jones' most marketable skill is swinging the ball. Not just reverse either.And that doesn't apply to Jones either?!
That 1/12 was during a stinking hot day in Adelaide. It was about as seamer UNfriendly as you can get. Sure he did the majority of his bowling at night but I promise you, as someone who was there, there wasn't a cloud in the sky all bloody day and all night. I remember the ground temp was in the high 40's most of it (possibly 51 degrees at one point?).a) he got 1 wicket, well done to him for that
b) it was an ODI
c) it was in seamer friendly conditions(as ive mentioned above he cant trouble batsmen unless he plays in seamer friendly conditions.
Yes, he has the rare ability to shape the ball conventionally in to the right hander, late.My thoughts. Jones' most marketable skill is swinging the ball. Not just reverse either.
Not to mention zip it away. It's what makes him so damaging when he gets it right; he gets that great movement and lift.Yes, he has the rare ability to shape the ball conventionally in to the right hander, late.
Just to point-out - you might have noticed - but that post is 3 years old.That 1/12 was during a stinking hot day in Adelaide. It was about as seamer UNfriendly as you can get. Sure he did the majority of his bowling at night but I promise you, as someone who was there, there wasn't a cloud in the sky all bloody day and all night. I remember the ground temp was in the high 40's most of it (possibly 51 degrees at one point?).
Jones is one of those truly remarkable cases - has the ability to get both new ball and old to swing both out and in, to order. Only Wasim Akram has ever been able to do that before.Not to mention zip it away. It's what makes him so damaging when he gets it right; he gets that great movement and lift.
Sidebottom >> Jones and Anderson as well. Strange call really.Sidebottom >>> Broad. Why would it be Sidebottom or Broad?
Well, he was one of two, Flintoff being the other.Wasn't Simon Jones the guy that ripped through the Australians in the 2005 Ashes series?