Fair go; the major changes to the Aussie line-up have been with the ball and they haven't had a bowl yet. It was always going to be the case that the Aussies would still bat well.You Australian cricket fans have never had it so easy. That's just my opinion but I hate one-sideness in Test cricket.
I support England aswell, so I know how you feelI've almost given up on this Test tbh because I can see how it is going. Clarke, Hussey and later Gilchrist will all put on massive totals, Australia to score a massive total between 500-600 at least, Sri Lanka to fold like a bunch of cards because Clark will just rip through them, Australia to bat again and see a total for Sri Lanka to win about 550+ and it is all over. Sri Lanka showed they never wanted to win by picking Fernando ahead of Malinga.
You Australian cricket fans have never had it so easy. That's just my opinion but I hate one-sideness in Test cricket.
Yerp, Murlai is the only one who even looks like getting a wicket. Vaas did bowl well this morning though tbf.Man - they really miss Malinga.
Didn't get the touch of cynicism? I just have a feeling this wicket will suit Clark and Johnson down to the ground.Fair go; the major changes to the Aussie line-up have been with the ball and they haven't had a bowl yet. It was always going to be the case that the Aussies would still bat well.
Possibly although I would say they'll have more trouble with MacGill. The conditions are clearly good for batting (as everyone should have been telling Jayawardene) so the Aussies will still have to bowl well. SL will deeply miss Sangakkara, though.Didn't get the touch of cynicism? I just have a feeling this wicket will suit Clark and Johnson down to the ground.
I thought all the Sri Lankans bowled pretty well this morning really.Yerp, Murlai is the only one who even looks like getting a wicket. Vaas did bowl well this morning though tbf.
I don't think many are convinced by Jaques, those on the radio yesterday certainly weren't.
Regarding Jaques, I'm still not convinced he's the long-term option to replace Langer.
Ya, I'm not convinced about Jaques.
Give the guy a break, it was his first real test match and he scored a hundred. He's scored piles and piles of runs at domestic level and had to come out and bat on a pitch which favoured the bowlers. Yeah it was scratchy but so was Hayden's first ton. I remember watching him score a brilliant ton vs QLD last season at the gabba (or was it the one before) when all but Haddin crumbled around him. QLD won that game but Jaques ton was the highlight for me (mainly cause I saw it all live). He's the long term replacement for Langer, just as Rogers will be for Hayden (probably) and will do a fine job.He's 28. Jaques is a good ordinary player, no more, no less. And with bowling attacks the way they are these days he'll probably do ok.
Bill Lawry is an excellent commentator. Not because he says particularly insightful things but because he brings greater excitement to the commentary box, which is excellent to listen toGreat first day of cricket (with the exception of Bill Lawry, how do you aussies stand that guy??)..
I think on his stock delivery it is less pronounced, but on his doosra/topspinner I notice a significant naked eye difference.Is it just me, or has Murali's action straightened up some since 03/04? Have just seen a few slow mo's of his bowling today and imo the "bend" in his arm doesn't look as bad as it used to.
Lets not get this thing started again!I think on his stock delivery it is less pronounced, but on his doosra/topspinner I notice a significant naked eye difference.