Well not really, if Watson has a high protein diet or good genetics that could easily mask the fact that his not actually strong. I do not know how much Watto lifts but Shaun Tait could easily lift more but Shaun may not abide to a particularly good diet, which means his body will not grow or Shaun may workout every day which would also mean his body would not be given sufficient time to grow/recover.
Why are you posting this in the Super 8s thread?Well, good for you - how does it feel to be wrong all these years. As I have been saying for years now (and proven right by Mr. Tendulkar's dismal performance match after match especially under pressure):
DROP TENDULKAR !
Ian Chappell is wrong - ZEROdulkar is not playing for statistics -- just for MONEY !!!
I'm sorry I did not know there was a difference, if I power train than my strength increases the two go hand in hand. But there are ways in amplifying the facade of strength i.e. muscles that has nothing to do with picking up a weight or using such 'strength'. It seems like your from the muscle mass equates strength school of thought, nothing wrong with that, it is still something which is highly debated especially upon the bodybuilding community. Although, I see it is a rather more complicated problematic.
It is, especially when you have to talk about it for a living.
PE teacher? Or some sort of biomechanist?It is, especially when you have to talk about it for a living.
No, I'm a part time gym instructor although; I'm doing my professional fitness instructor course when I finish Uni later this spring. Money for old rope, however, it costs £2,500 for a piece of paper which indicates you know the difference between the bicep and tricep. Its not rocket science but some people seem to believe it is and the amount of conflicting theories and methods you receive are immense. Not only makes you hate your job but working out tbh.
