It never was ordinary- scoring runs in India against quality spinners have always been the supreme test of your skills against spin and every 'great' batsman has atleast a half-decent record in India, not a record that even a tailender wouldnt be comfortable with. Even today, facing Kumble (and if Harbhajan is around,him too) on a 4th-5th day pitch in India is harder than facing Warne or Murali. He has to get atleast half-decent in India before i consider him for alltime greatness-for without that, he isnt entering my top 10 or even top 15 batsmen of alltime, even if he finishes his career with 15K test runs and 50 centuries.Craig said:Like I asked before why is so important that Ponting scores in India? Since when did it become anything out of the ordinary?
Craig said:Well Sir Garry Sobers was rubbish in New Zealand on often slower, seaming wickets, although that was a mental thing would that make him less of a player?
And would the same apply for Don Bradman?
silentstriker said:A) Ponting is not Indian, last time I checked.
B) Considering I only rate two Indian batsman, and one Indian bowler right now as being any good, your point is meaningless.
Over their careers:
1. Sachin
2. Lara
3. Ponting
4. Dravid
5. Kallis
6. Gilchrist
7. Inzamam
8. Hayden
Folks like Yousuf and Sehwag would come in after. Yousuf ahead of Sehwag though.
Yea, thats why I said Yousuf ahead of Sehwag.magsi23 said:comparing sehwag with yousuf is laughable. yousuf is far better batsmen than sehwag and more consistent
silentstriker said:Right, so over their careers, I would rate Ponting higher.
So predictable......silentstriker said:Right, so over their careers, I would rate Ponting higher.
Err no.Ponting, on the other hand, is by far the best player in the world at present and his record in India, in light of how he treats spinners the world over, should be seen as nothing more than an anomaly.