Akram was the best because he was dangerous and adaptable at all stages of the game. He was a difficult new ball bowler, and later in the innings could reverse swing to devastating effect. I think his difference was that he always attacked, rarely resorted to containing like others, and was still so difficult to hit and get away for runs. He was so awkward, batsmen rarely went after him and usually played him out while attacking Waqar and the others.
All in good time, lad. You'll get another chance to put Imran on top of another list, I guess.Why no threads about alltime allrounders?
No Garner JB ? Or is it a non-Windies list1. McGrath
2. Warne
3. Lillee
4. Akram
5. Hadlee
6. Bond
7. Pollock
8. Botham
9. Donald
10. Waqar Younis
agree.. i think pakistan's strongest team ever in a ODI was the 99 world cup..and it was because of wasim..KaZoH0lic,
Wasim's world cup record, during the 90's, is pretty awesome.
25 213.4 815 36 4/32 4/40 22.63 3.81 35.6 2 0
Perhaps the best bowler of the '92 world cup, including THAT spell. Struggled in the 96 world cup in terms of taking wickets, but even so conceeded runs at 4 per over. Had an excellent '99 world cup and was the backbone of perhaps the strongest bowling attack pakistan has fielded.
Who would you take off???? Decisions, Decisions,DecisionsNo Garner JB ? Or is it a non-Windies list
I would take off Botham from your list to include either Garner or Ambrose. Maybe take off Botham AND Bond to include them both.Who would you take off???? Decisions, Decisions,Decisions
Its true. Waqar was never great at keeping the runs down like Wasim was, and was known for splaying it about. But when he got the ball in the right places, he was lethal, especially later in the innings with the greatest yorker ever seen.Do you think that is why Waqar got such a lot of 4/5 fors? Waqar had a high E/R of 4.6 but had a great S/R. Thanks to you, now I think I know why.
I honestly have enjoyed watching Waqar bowl at his peak as much as any other bowler in world cricket. He looked lethal, likely to take a wicket with every delivery, like Holding did.Its true. Waqar was never great at keeping the runs down like Wasim was, and was known for splaying it about. But when he got the ball in the right places, he was lethal, especially later in the innings with the greatest yorker ever seen.
I'm suprised people don't talk more about Murali taking wickets off lesser sides ala Bangladesh when it comes to ODI's. People beat that horse deader than dead when talking about his performances in Tests, but there's a far greater disparity between Murali's performances against New Zealand, Bangladesh and Zimbabwe than there is against the rest in ODI's. Take those three sides out of the Murali ODI equation and his figures change far more drastically than most people realise.
NZ better than WI Eng Pak Ind in ODI half the time? (at least 50/50)
None of these sides ODI class (whatever that means) now?