biased indian
International Coach
Ashly giles
he bowls most of the time negative style

he bowls most of the time negative style
With only one significant score.marc71178 said:He had a whole series in SL, all of those matches included in that average.
i doubt though that we'll see a drought of runs from him against australia(unless warne has something to do with it)....its more a question of whether he can convert those 30s-40s into big scores.Craig said:That maybe so, but if he doesnt pull off the goods v Australia next season, he wont be as great as what you tell me is.
Please show me where I have called him "Great"?Craig said:That maybe so, but if he doesnt pull off the goods v Australia next season, he wont be as great as what you tell me is.
To say that suggests you are unwilling to give him any credit ever.Craig said:It's ll very well to speculate, but I'm prepared to wait. To say he was missed in the last Ashes is pure speculation.
how many players did we miss on that tour btw?marc71178 said:To say that suggests you are unwilling to give him any credit ever.
A form player that really balanced our team make-up, of course he was missed!
What I am saying there isnt any proof he would of made a difference to England winning or not.marc71178 said:To say that suggests you are unwilling to give him any credit ever.
A form player that really balanced our team make-up, of course he was missed!
Sir Richard Hadlee was far crappier than Don Bradman. In fact, every other player in recorded history is/was far crappier than Bradman.spofta said:Don Bradman was crap and very overrated and only played england and england have been and always will be ****. The "don" had many technical flaws that nobody ever seem to exploit or talk about. Average should of been 9.94 not 99.94
Looks like Pinky fell out with Perky.spofta said:Don Bradman was crap and very overrated and only played england and england have been and always will be ****. The "don" had many technical flaws that nobody ever seem to exploit or talk about. Average should of been 9.94 not 99.94
he did get a couple of opportunities against india in 2002 and failed, and then got 2 more against zim in 2003 where he failed miserably yet again. against australia he got 4 chances and only averaged 17. quite frankly hes not good enough at test level and even if he scores a century against every visiting team in england i would still be reluctant to pick himPrince EWS said:Robert Key has been very harhsly trreated in this forum. He has ONLY played against Australia and hasnt done that badly, getting a few 40s when other players failed miserably.
He was also batting out of position.
Anyway, Elton Chigumbura.
so who do you rate as the best player ever?anthony mcgrath?sanford?spofta said:Don Bradman was crap and very overrated and only played england and england have been and always will be ****. The "don" had many technical flaws that nobody ever seem to exploit or talk about. Average should of been 9.94 not 99.94
spofta said:Don Bradman was crap and very overrated and only played england and england have been and always will be ****. The "don" had many technical flaws that nobody ever seem to exploit or talk about. Average should of been 9.94 not 99.94