luckyeddie
Cricket Web Staff Member
Just missed that bit, then?koch_cha said:sorry mate u got it wrong i watched it live on TV
Just missed that bit, then?koch_cha said:sorry mate u got it wrong i watched it live on TV
Yeah, he's kept pretty well in the test to this pointluckyeddie said:You just can't win with some people.
Here you go. 2 byes in the day...
82.1 Saggers to Astle, bye: two runs, well down the legside, Jones dives
towards his left and unable to stop it peoperly
If I remember rightly, it was an absolute full-length dive and saved two rather than cost two.
Not madness - just not really sensible (given the stroke he played to get out)Langeveldt said:Just speculating, but would it be madness to suggest that Jones would make a viable specialist batsman for England? That way they would have a superior keeper in Read...
Tim said:McCullum has been the better overall keeper in this series because Jones was seriously poor at Lords & then average at Headingly.
McCullum was far better than Jones at Headingley. I was there. He made some excellent stops and Jones left a lot to be desired.marc71178 said:Sorry, but McCullum wasn't that hot at either venue either, and to call Jones average at Headingley is harsh when you consider his second innings effort...
he is good enough to play as a specialist batsman although i find it hard to understand why he should.....we have 6 batsman who are certainities in the side and collingwood in the reserves, so theres no real place to have a specialist keeper and a keeper batsman in there. and i dont think jones' keeping is that bad at all, he was quite brilliant in that 2nd innings at headingly and hes been quite tidy in the 3rd test as well. he will steadily improve and become a better keeper just like Stewart.Langeveldt said:Just speculating, but would it be madness to suggest that Jones would make a viable specialist batsman for England? That way they would have a superior keeper in Read...
totally agreed.. was just throwing some random thoughts into the air...tooextracool said:he is good enough to play as a specialist batsman although i find it hard to understand why he should.....we have 6 batsman who are certainities in the side and collingwood in the reserves, so theres no real place to have a specialist keeper and a keeper batsman in there. and i dont think jones' keeping is that bad at all, he was quite brilliant in that 2nd innings at headingly and hes been quite tidy in the 3rd test as well. he will steadily improve and become a better keeper just like Stewart.
Lords and Headingly probably the 2 worst places to keep in england though. There aren't many grounds in the world as bad as them 2.Tim said:Yeah sure Jones made that ONE great take, which in fairness was an excellent take..but that doesn't hide the fact that during those 2 tests he was quite frankly sub-standard. Jones has improved in the 3rd test however.
McCullum has trouble keeping to Vettori, but that's no surprise considering he's hardly had to keep to Vettori since he's been on the scene..Vettori's hardly bowled! let alone keeping for Wiseman at Canterbury...Wiseman is usually being hit out of the park so McCullum doesn't get to do much glovework.
Tim said:Yeah sure Jones made that ONE great take, which in fairness was an excellent take..but that doesn't hide the fact that during those 2 tests he was quite frankly sub-standard. Jones has improved in the 3rd test however.
the series hadnt yet been won in the 2nd innings of the 2nd test.Tim said:no doubt...but he may have also become more relaxed because the series had been won.