Riggins
International Captain
I've never heard him speak full stop. Hard to imagine him with a classic west indian accent tbh.How come I have never heard Chanderpaul himself speak on the topic? I would love to see it from his point of view.
I've never heard him speak full stop. Hard to imagine him with a classic west indian accent tbh.How come I have never heard Chanderpaul himself speak on the topic? I would love to see it from his point of view.
Id imagine a player that play's over 150 test matches would have more experience to handle the match situation better. Its not a new situation, how can he not have worked on a strategy after 20 years of international cricket. Does he just not care?I wouldn't say he Is selfish and batting for his average. This is just the way he bats. He sort of gets into this bubbble and focuses on the ball and blocks out the match situation and what is happening at the other hand. He is too busy concentrating to have the mental space to also think about how to farm the strike, or how to pinch runs here and there by being cheeky or unorthodox. He just faces each ball, plays the best shot for it, takes the runs, and waits to face the next ball.
It's just not a style suited to farming the strike. If he started worrying about that, he may nick off sooner.
I agree he should bat higher, and that he is a second tier ATG. But I dont think he's being deliberately selfish.
Also not in anyway defending Chanders or his innings last night. Just curious.OverratedSanity, do you think Shiv was at fault in any of his 3 tests during that epic series he had vs. Aus in 2008?
Scorecard - 2007-2008 Frank Worrell Trophy - 1st Test - 22/05/2008
Scorecard - 2007-2008 Frank Worrell Trophy - 2nd Test - 30/05/2008
Scorecard - 2007-2008 Frank Worrell Trophy - 3rd Test - 12/06/2008
I don'tt think it's the bubble that's the problem (seen this a bit). Watling has a growing reputation for managing the New Zealand tail very well and he lives in a bubble at the crease.I wouldn't say he Is selfish and batting for his average. This is just the way he bats. He sort of gets into this bubbble and focuses on the ball and blocks out the match situation and what is happening at the other hand. He is too busy concentrating to have the mental space to also think about how to farm the strike, or how to pinch runs here and there by being cheeky or unorthodox. He just faces each ball, plays the best shot for it, takes the runs, and waits to face the next ball.
It's just not a style suited to farming the strike. If he started worrying about that, he may nick off sooner.
I agree he should bat higher, and that he is a second tier ATG. But I dont think he's being deliberately selfish.
I think that is a good counter to *****'s point, and you can say the same about Kallis who could up the ante when he wanted. Doesn't mean they aren't better at test cricket when they are playing their usual method though. Showing you are capable of shifting doesn't mean you trust it completely as a batsman when playing your usual way works.Nah Chanderpaul has always had plenty of gears, you don't score a 69 ball 100 in Test cricket if you can't accelerate. Or score 10 off the last 2 balls of an ODI to win.
Probably not, because I didn't watch that series live, so I don't have too much context to apply to the scorecard.OverratedSanity, do you think Shiv was at fault in any of his 3 tests during that epic series he had vs. Aus in 2008?
Scorecard - 2007-2008 Frank Worrell Trophy - 1st Test - 22/05/2008
Scorecard - 2007-2008 Frank Worrell Trophy - 2nd Test - 30/05/2008
Scorecard - 2007-2008 Frank Worrell Trophy - 3rd Test - 12/06/2008
See I knew someone would say that and the fact that Chanderpaul stays not out is not the issue. The real problem is that he fails to realise when he needs to protect the tail, or atleast face a few more deliveries.I love how we're criticising a batsman for not giving his wicket away and staying not out.
I think Chanderpaul would be more highly rated if he'd had any sort of memorable innings in a victory from the last 15 years. It's hard to rate a guy too highly when all his good innings are basically "Chanderpaul fought valiantly and scored a century as the West Indies capitulated to a 10 wicket/innings and 17 million run defeat".
Have the same criticisms of Sachin in the 2nd innings of this match?See I knew someone would say that and the fact that Chanderpaul stays not out is not the issue. The real problem is that he fails to realise when he needs to protect the tail, or atleast face a few more deliveries.
I don't think anyone who watched the match live yesterday would disagree with me that Chanders missed a trick. After Ramdin went a collapse was on the cards. The way Steyn was steaming in, it was obvious it was one of his crazy eye spells which needed blunting from Steyn. He didn't shield Holder, which I can agree with... he's ot a mug with the bat. Taylor threw it away, nothing CHanders could do after that.
But Chanderpaul just had to face more deliveries now, surely. There was no way Gabriel and Benn would keep surviving when Chanderpaul repeatedly didn't even attempt to protect them, even a bit. Just because I criticise him for being **** with the tail doesn't mean I don't think he's a great batsman. But if he bats as low down as 5 in a weak batting lineup and doesn't find a way to bat with the tail, he should cop his fair share of flak.
Very slightly, but nah, the criticism he got for that knock was harsh. The situation after Dhoni got out was so hopeless that he needed the tail to bat normally and hope for a miraculous partnership. Could he have taken a bit more of the strike, yeah, maybe. But say in that game, if when Dhoni got out, we were 60-70 runs ahead, I have no doubt whatsoever that Sachin would've taken the strike a bit more to build the lead.Have the same criticisms of Sachin in the 2nd innings of this match?
Scorecard - 2010-2011 South Africa v India - 1st Test - 16/12/2010
Exactly right. If he was or if someone was doing this for our own sides they would cop a whole heap of flak for it. I could only imagine how much criticism McCullum would cop if he batted in such a manner.But Chanderpaul just had to face more deliveries now, surely. There was no way Gabriel and Benn would keep surviving when Chanderpaul repeatedly didn't even attempt to protect them, even a bit. Just because I criticise him for being **** with the tail doesn't mean I don't think he's a great batsman. But if he bats as low down as 5 in a weak batting lineup and doesn't find a way to bat with the tail, he should cop his fair share of flak.
You don't watch post-match presentations I assume?I've never heard him speak full stop.