Who is currently the best all-rounder at international level?

[steds]

I'd give you credit if you were able to beat our first team.

So McGrath is your first team on his own? Lardarse won't be too happy about you defecting and hero-worshipping McGrath, I'll bet

 

[Shane Warne]

So McGrath is your first team on his own? Lardarse won't be too happy about you defecting and hero-worshipping McGrath, I'll bet

He's 50% of the bowling.

 

[steds]

He's 50% of the bowling.

That says a HUGE amount about the depth and quality of Australia's bowling

 

[marc71178]

I'd give you credit if you were able to beat our first team.

Missing 1 whole player.

If you're so reliant on McGrath one could question just how good Australia actually are...

 

[steds]

Missing 1 whole player.

If you're so reliant on McGrath one could question just how good Australia actually are...

And he's got a batting average in single figures, too. So no excuses for all the wickets Giles and Flintoff have taken are available.

 

[Top_Cat]

 

[King_Ponting]

Originally Posted by Natman20
I have noticed that most people in this thread are English and that shows as youre all biased with Flintoff. I would rate Cairns higher I think.

Im australian and i rate flintoff as the best.... What bias does that show?

 

[chalky]

I'd give you credit if you were able to beat our first team.

So Australia get no credit for winning the last Ashes series then

Gough, Flintoff, Jones, Giles, Thorpe, Tudor, Silverwood, Crawley, Stewart all got injured before or during the last ashes series. I've Probably missed some out aswell.

 

[Shane Warne]

So Australia get no credit for winning the last Ashes series then

Gough, Flintoff, Jones, Giles, Thorpe, Tudor, Silverwood, Crawley, Stewart all got injured before or during the last ashes series. I've Probably missed some out aswell.

The difference between Mcgrath and all of them though, is that Mcgrath is actually good.

 

[Shane Warne]

Originally Posted by Natman20
I have noticed that most people in this thread are English and that shows as youre all biased with Flintoff. I would rate Cairns higher I think.

Im australian and i rate flintoff as the best.... What bias does that show?

Bias in favor of stupid opinions.

 

[King_Ponting]

Can you honestly say that Anyone other than Flintoff is currently a better Batting/ Bowling allrounder?

 

[Shane Warne]

Can you honestly say that Anyone other than Flintoff is currently a better Batting/ Bowling allrounder?

Yes.

 

[King_Ponting]

Yes.

Who?

 

[Shane Warne]

Who?

Jayasuriya, Gayle, Symonds, Cairns, Pollock, Kallis, Afridi, Razzaq.

 

[King_Ponting]

Jayasuriya, Gayle, Symonds, Cairns, Pollock, Kallis, Afridi, Razzaq.

Can i have some of that medicinal you've been smoking?

 

[Swervy]

Jayasuriya, Gayle, Symonds, Cairns, Pollock, Kallis, Afridi, Razzaq.

right,you are either trying to wind people up..or you a real sore loser...or you are clueless...actually you are probably two of those three options

Cainrs doesnt even play tests anymore..Symonds isnt considered to be good enough by the Australian team to play tests (Ponting even said Australia would pick Flintoff if they could)...Razzaq is a test match bowling no goer, as is Kallis...Afridi is never going to do well in more than one test in 10..Jaya couldnt be consiered a test all rounder..neither could Gayle, leaves Pollock out of that list...and Flintoff is a better batsman, fielder and if the last few years have anything to say about it a best strike bowler than Pollock as well.

Again, Flintoff wins

 

[villaturk]

Fredie,freddie,freddie!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[Shane Warne]

Warne's as good an allrounder as flintoff.

 

[King_Ponting]

Warne's as good an allrounder as flintoff.

Depends what your talking about. and whether its on or off the cricket feild

 

[superkingdave]

Warne's rounder than flintoff.

that i'd agree