TheJediBrah
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Don't even imply that Afridi is on a similar level to Jayasuriya or Gilchrist as a batsman. Or cricketer.Same logic goes for Jayasuria, Afridi and Gilly.
Don't even imply that Afridi is on a similar level to Jayasuriya or Gilchrist as a batsman. Or cricketer.Same logic goes for Jayasuria, Afridi and Gilly.
He's saying he'd move Rohit down the order to get Sehwag in there and play both, not that Sehwag was actually better.Both are probably overrated but come on we're not seriously suggesting that Sehwag > Rohit in ODIs, in any context
Of course not. Rohit is better but we okay both and Sehwag as blaster opener.Both are probably overrated but come on we're not seriously suggesting that Sehwag > Rohit in ODIs, in any context
Nope. I am saying there is a specified blaster opener role in modern ODI cricket.Don't even imply that Afridi is on a similar level to Jayasuriya or Gilchrist as a batsman. Or cricketer.
My friend, if I rubbed you the wrong way, my apologies. I do enjoy these back and forths.But he has been really overdosing on his strike rate bull**** across the forum lately so who knows. Being wrong isn't really unusual for him but arguing it in such a trollish and silly manner definitely is.
Strike rate not mattering at all is a 10x more nonsensical and ridiculous take. The suggestion should be laughed out of the room every time.But he has been really overdosing on his strike rate bull**** across the forum lately so who knows. Being wrong isn't really unusual for him but arguing it in such a trollish and silly manner definitely is.
Yes. If anything, it matters way more in ODIs. Anyone who watches cricket should understand how your rate of scoring runs affects the state of the game.Strike rate not mastering at all is a 10x more nonsensical and ridiculous take. The suggestion should be laughed out of the room every time.
Better fielder, yes. That's about it.So we can finally agree that Kapil >> Imran in ODIs
Better bat alsoBetter fielder, yes. That's about it.
Lol not with a 23 average. He belongs with the Afridi's of the world...Better bat also
Afridi was a better bat than ImranLol not with a 23 average. He belongs with the Afridi's of the world...
If you rate Afridi so high, why not Sehwag?Afridi was a better bat than Imran
No I just rate Imran low because of his SRIf you rate Afridi so high, why not Sehwag?
Afridi > Dean Jones confirmedNo I just rate Imran low because of his SR
Dean Jones didn't hide lower down the order inflate his average like a certain KhanAfridi > Dean Jones confirmed
Imran literally averages more the higher up he bats compared to Kapil's disastrous middle order record.Dean Jones didn't hide lower down the order inflate his average like a certain Khan
We are now talking about Afridi and Imran. Kapil vs Imran was ages ago. Get with the times, old man.Imran literally averages more the higher up he bats compared to Kapil's disastrous middle order record.
How can you use that critique of Imran in relation to Kapil?Dean Jones didn't hide lower down the order inflate his average like a certain Khan
Average of 23 is hardly AR. It’s Imran by streets. Kapil was a bowler who could bat, Imran was a proper AR.Lol not with a 23 average. He belongs with the Afridi's of the world...