And it was on the back of an epic series against England as well.Weekes definitely wins on peer rating and did moderately better in England. But Walcott had THAT series against Australia.
Cough cough and England right before....Weekes definitely wins on peer rating and did moderately better in England. But Walcott had THAT series against Australia.
Yeah Weekes was still prolific in both series but Walcott was even betterCough cough and England right before....
You know what, you are 100% correct. And both had one good series in England and one awful. Then they both had one awful series in Australia, without any chance to redeem themselves. Still Walcott's performance was otherworldly which is why I give him the edge.Yeah Weekes was still prolific in both series but Walcott was even better
That's why I actually always went with Weekes. Because he had a dead-set good tour of England unlike Clyde, whereas both actually did well in the two Walcott magnum opus series'. But Walcott's barrage of hundreds came against much better attacks than the one Weekes beat up in England.You know what, you are 100% correct. And both had one good series in England and one awful. Then they both had one awful series in Australia, without any chance to redeem themselves. Still Walcott's performance was otherworldly which is why I give him the edge.
I think a lot of people place him 2nd.Worrell always overlooked in this comparison.