• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Weekes vs Walcott

Better batsman


  • Total voters
    23

Coronis

Hall of Fame Member
While Tom Graveney says, diplomatically, in his interview with CMJ there that he can't split the three Ws, he did in fact do so on at least one occasion.

In Tom Graveney's Top Ten Cricket Book (one of my all time favourite and most referenced cricket books), published in 1982, his list of the Top Ten Greatest Post-War Batsmen had Walcott at number 6 and Weekes and number 9, while also noting that he agonised over Worrell just missing out.
What other top 10’s did he have again? I feel I’ve read this referenced somewhere but can’t recall
 

The Sean

Cricketer Of The Year
What other top 10’s did he have again? I feel I’ve read this referenced somewhere but can’t recall
Probably by me - I've referenced it a lot!

He had loads. The first half of the book was just list after list - batsmen (including openers, left handers, opening partnerships, best shots etc), bowlers (fast, medium and slow, new ball and spin partnerships), all-rounders, captains, teams. Split into post-war, pre-war and old-time (pre-WWI).

Then the second half of the book was him picking teams - national teams, county teams, alphabet teams, then novelty teams like a team of blokes who had been schoolteacher, or wore glasses, or represented their country at other sports, or who went to Oxford/Cambridge etc.
 

Top