I bought The Times yesterday. Not my usual rag, but I wanted to read Gideon Haigh's piece on Philip Hughes.
It was, as I expected, a super piece of writing. Articulate, sensitive, and generally spot on. As was Mike Atherton's piece in the same paper. The paper's reference to Adam Gilchrist's tweet about Sean Abbott only added to collective excellence of the cricket section.
Then I turned to the letters page, and it seems the retired generals have been out in force. One old git opined that helmets should be banned as that would force batsmen to get their heads out of the way. Another suggested that a line should be drawn across the pitch, with any balls pitching before it being called as no-balls, with persistent offenders being withdrawn from the attack - which, apart from various other arguments, does rather ignore that all batsmen and bowlers are not the same height. And finally some ignorant turd tried to link Hughes' death with Australia's aggressive approach to the last Ashes. Real classy stuff. Now I know there are plenty of idiots out there who might hold these sort of views, but what on earth was the paper doing printing them?
Sorry if anyone objects to me putting this here, but it annoyed me.