To End All Arguements

[aussie_beater]

Is that right?
I can say with absolute certainty that a healthy percentage of those tracks would have been belters. Any argument there?

Which tracks ?? The subcontinental tracks or the rest ?? I gave you the statistical breakdown of Ganguly's scores in ODIs which shows that 54 % of his runs were scored in subcontinental tracks.

Now answer one question for me.....like you said earlier that Ganguly scored "bulk" of his runs in the sub-continent, does 54 % constitute "bulk" in your book or its just a fair reflection of the distribution of ODIs played in the world ??

 

[SquidAU]

SquidAU - Do you think the Current Australian Attack of Lee-Gillespis-Bracken-Williams-Bichel is better than Agarkar-Pathan-Balaji-Nehra-Bhandari ?

I think that both teams have a poor pace attack....neither is better than the other!

 

[Sanz]

I think that both teams have a poor pace attack....neither is better than the other!

You made my day.

 

[SquidAU]

You made my day.

Glad to see I made someone happy.....

 

[Kenny]

Which tracks ?? The subcontinental tracks or the rest ?? I gave you the statistical breakdown of Ganguly's scores in ODIs which shows that 54 % of his runs were scored in subcontinental tracks.

Now answer one question for me.....like you said earlier that Ganguly scored "bulk" of his runs in the sub-continent, does 54 % constitute "bulk" in your book or its just a fair reflection of the distribution of ODIs played in the world ??

*sigh* Someone said if you mean the tracks in Australia, England and South Afirca, to which I responded that a healthy percentage of those tracks would have been belters - what is hard to understand?
As to the 54% of his runs scored on the subcontinent, I find that hard to believe - do you have proof of those numbers?
Most of the ODI are played on the sub-continent aren't they - for example Sri Lanka plays a lot more ODI cricket than Australia does........****ed if I know, I feel this is getting fairly petty - he is clearly not good enough a player to have scored too many runs against Australia in ODI!!!

 

[aussie_beater]

*sigh* Someone said if you mean the tracks in Australia, England and South Afirca, to which I responded that a healthy percentage of those tracks would have been belters - what is hard to understand?

Going by that assumption, why should we think that only Ganguly's stats are skewed. All other players of all other countries INCLUDING Australia, with good averages also played in those tracks and got there averages fattened, right ? Why do we have to pick on Ganguly then ? Or are you suggesting that cricket boards of the countries you mentioned above, went out of their way to prepare the belters whenever they saw the Indian lineup included a name called "Saurav Ganguly" ..... its time for a reality check for you mate...remove those tinted glasses you are wearing.

As to the 54% of his runs scored on the subcontinent, I find that hard to believe - do you have proof of those numbers?

For your kind information, www.cricinfo.com has a thing called "StatsGuru".....go get your own proof before questioning.

I feel this is getting fairly petty - he is clearly not good enough a player to have scored too many runs against Australia in ODI!!!

Well look who is getting petty....and desperate.