The point is Dhoni prefers to get the not out with a low SR. Many batsmen prefer getting out and maximising SR.You have to be a really, really mathematically challenged (and have a severe lack of common sense) to think that averages are somehow less if they are "boosted by not outs"
What did I say? I'm talking about not outs. Not SR.The point is Dhoni prefers to get the not out with a low SR. Many batsmen prefer getting out and maximising SR.
You need to make the most of the balls available. Dhoni doesn’t do that.
If you don’t understand then you are incredibly dumb.
He bats for himself, his average and not the team. Very mediocre player and his stats since 2006 in ODIs suggest he’s the most overrated odi player ever by a distance.
Perhaps. Bradman could maybe have been the first to 10,000 if it wasn't for the War.rangana could have been the second or third greatest spin bowler of all time in terms of wickets taken if murali didn't ever exist
Happy with being in the company of Gary Sobers, Len Hutton and Martin Crowe.That opinion is understandably unpopular.
Len Hutton was defensive too.Bradman, the ultimate batsman, said it best. Gavaskar was an excellent technician but too defensive. He was a fluent strokemaker and in the top 10 to have ever played but he was simply too defensive. If you want a draw he's your best bet though. Richards, Hobbs, Hutton, and Tendulkar would all be ashraf imo.
Woh?Len Hutton was defensive too.
In Gavaskar's case, a draw was equivalent to a victory then. Its not his fault.
People think of talent being something inherent, and the work you put in to make use of it as being within a person's controlMy view is that talent is more of a head start than something that gets you all the way. You can possibly overcome the need for it by just working harder.
OkPeople think of talent being something inherent, and the work you put in to make use of it as being within a person's control
I think the extent to which a person utlises their inherent talent, is, in of itself, a talent too.
You're seriously conflating the meaning of words and phrases within the English language here.People think of talent being something inherent, and the work you put in to make use of it as being within a person's control
I think the extent to which a person utlises their inherent talent, is, in of itself, a talent too.