sledger
Spanish_Vicente
The Dude Love version.Which you, though?
The Dude Love version.Which you, though?
Yeah that's spark's name.Are any mods called Keith?
Asking for a friend.
The whole world struggled to do that tbfHow can we take that seriously when the mod team couldn't even control one Nazi for 10 years?
I'm just taking my revenge out on you all for the depressing amount of times someone incorrectly drafted Lillee when Hoggard was still available.Meanwhile the peaceful draft community continues to get screwed over and subdued. They won’t let us draft players anymore at this rate. Without us Cricket Chat would be just an empty hall with forlorn echos of past glories.
I contribute heavily in the mod forum whenever issues come up. I do the in-thread modding that I think is actually appropriate (which is just... less than most people would suggest, I think; I've always been pretty lenient).To take the OP seriously and non-sarcastically - and ignoring anything else that has already been said in this thread - the mod team really does need to be reviewed. To find when about half the team was regular visitors you have to dig up decade old threads. There's only two regulars in cricket chat (and it's debatable if PEWS actually does any modding). At least stripping the status from the fossils would be a good start.
We've noticed.I've always been pretty lenient
point 567 why GS Kohli should be binned offI contribute heavily in the mod forum whenever issues come up. I do the in-thread modding that I think is actually appropriate (which is just... less than most people would suggest, I think; I've always been pretty lenient).
I also spend at least 30 minutes a week editing GS Kohli thread titles.
I think just stopping him creating threads would be fine, but if that can be done and who has the power are evidently issues.point 567 why GS Kohli should be binned off
It can be. I like it. Factions on either side of me dislike it for opposite reasons (some want to get rid entirely, some don't want to create a two-tiered society).I think just stopping him creating threads would be fine, but if that can be done and who has the power are evidently issues.
I'd argue that stopping someone from creating threads is less two-tier than banning someone completely.It can be. I like it. Factions on either side of me dislike it for opposite reasons (some want to get rid entirely, some don't wait to create a two-tiered society).
idk what people like about him spamming threads and posts with material from other cricket sites and making all of them an Indian comparison even when totally irrelevant especially when same people despise sites like cricinfoIt can be. I like it. Factions on either side of me dislike it for opposite reasons (some want to get rid entirely, some don't wait to create a two-tiered society).
Daily mod post reminder that Head > Wade.having only 2 mods that post daily is sus
Both match thread spam artists toohaving only 2 mods that post daily is sus