• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

The Best WC Final Knock

The Best Knock

  • LLoyd 102 - 1975

    Votes: 7 25.9%
  • Viv Richard 138 - 1979

    Votes: 2 7.4%
  • DeSilva 107* - 1996

    Votes: 3 11.1%
  • Ponting 143 - 2003

    Votes: 4 14.8%
  • Gilly 149 - 2007

    Votes: 6 22.2%
  • Dhoni 91* - 2011

    Votes: 1 3.7%
  • Stokes 84* - 2019

    Votes: 4 14.8%

  • Total voters
    27

Godard

U19 Vice-Captain
What about 1983 WC final. Close, but not as close as Aus-Sa 99 SF, or Eng-NZ 19, but it was almost a minnow level side against the greatest ODI team ever assembled, and after the 1st innings the task was even more Herculean. And in context of a nation’s cricketing development and future, it was mightily important. They had basically won one match in WCs, prior to that WC. 1996 Sl was an underdog win, this was something even more surprising.
 

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
after 3 years of roadfests it was pleasing to see an even contest between bat and ball in the final. the only reason why you’d feel that way is because of how odis have been for most of that decade. there were lots of interesting battles in the final you’re neglecting
The whole 2019 WC was full of good contests. I remember in the lead up everyone was saying it would be 300 vs 300 every game. When it didn’t turn out that way it became a great tournament
 

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
after 3 years of roadfests it was pleasing to see an even contest between bat and ball in the final. the only reason why you’d feel that way is because of how odis have been for most of that decade. there were lots of interesting battles in the final you’re neglecting
Didn't want to make it seem that the final wasn't interesting, of course it was, but it was a 'slow burner' in the sense that it built up to an epic climax with a sort of grind fight that swayed back and forth.

The 99 semi was just box office from the beginning though, literally with Mark Waugh lost in the first over. You had Donald and Pollock in epic form, then Bevan and Waugh rebuilt Australia, then SA got off to a solid start before Warne did his magic, then all the twists leading to the end with Klusener. As a game of quality cricket with several elite performances, to me it is unmatched.
 
Last edited:

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
The whole 2019 WC was full of good contests. I remember in the lead up everyone was saying it would be 300 vs 300 every game. When it didn’t turn out that way it became a great tournament
So was the 2011 WC, many close contests in that as well.
 

Godard

U19 Vice-Captain
The 1999-2007 Aus ODI teams didn’t play in the 1983 WC
For me 1979-83 WI teams slightly better than that. The greatest ODI batsmen and bowler in one team, great bowling attack apart from that. Great openers, good middle order.Only really lacked a great spinner, but then Aus didn’t have any close to Viv Richards as a batsmen. Maybe equal?
 

Socerer 01

International Captain
The whole 2019 WC was full of good contests. I remember in the lead up everyone was saying it would be 300 vs 300 every game. When it didn’t turn out that way it became a great tournament
the Pak England series just 2 months before that on same grounds had 350 being par scores :laugh:
 

wpdavid

Hall of Fame Member
I feel Lloyd has a much better case now, with Gilly and Aravinda behind. Lloyd faced the best attack any of them did(although Aravinda is close)peak Lillee and Thomson with Gilmour on top, came in a very bad situation, was burdened with captaincy also, was the main aggressor throughout the innings. Plus the first WC final.
Also Max Walker. It really was a top Australian attack.
 

Ashes81

State Vice-Captain
I'm lucky enough, or to put it another way, old enough ?, to have seen all the knocks in question and they were all brilliant in their own way.

There's 2 that stick out for me and they're - Lloyd and Stokes.

102 off 85 doesn't look that special now but in those days it certainly was. Big Clive came in with the W Indies in trouble and by the standards of the time, he took a top attack apart. Lloyd was such a powerful player - we was a monster of a man, he could brutalise an attack.

Stokes' innings was very different but what makes it stand out for me was the pressure it was played under.

Not only was it a home WC final against a very good side, but he was also playing against the history of England's 3 lost finals.

This was our time to win, to banish our precious failures and finally bring the WC home.

We were the best team in the world and it looked like we were going to fail at the final hurdle again.

Stokes' innings wasn't fluent, the pitch saw to that, but by sheer will power, belligerence and a never say die attitude he got the job done via the super over.

I don't think you could play an ODI innings under more pressure.
 

Socerer 01

International Captain
I'm lucky enough, or to put it another way, old enough ?, to have seen all the knocks in question and they were all brilliant in their own way.

There's 2 that stick out for me and they're - Lloyd and Stokes.

102 off 85 doesn't look that special now but in those days it certainly was. Big Clive came in with the W Indies in trouble and by the standards of the time, he took a top attack apart. Lloyd was such a powerful player - we was a monster of a man, he could brutalise an attack.

Stokes' innings was very different but what makes it stand out for me was the pressure it was played under.

Not only was it a home WC final against a very good side, but he was also playing against the history of England's 3 lost finals.

This was our time to win, to banish our precious failures and finally bring the WC home.

We were the best team in the world and it looked like we were going to fail at the final hurdle again.

Stokes' innings wasn't fluent, the pitch saw to that, but by sheer will power, belligerence and a never say die attitude he got the job done via the super over.

I don't think you could play an ODI innings under more pressure.
the last part isn’t strictly true, the context and pressure around Dhoni was even bigger than Stokes imo
 

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
the last part isn’t strictly true, the context and pressure around Dhoni was even bigger than Stokes imo
Stokes was easily under the same amount of pressure if not more. If Dhoni went, India could still have won. If Stokes went, game over for England.
 

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
I'm lucky enough, or to put it another way, old enough ?, to have seen all the knocks in question and they were all brilliant in their own way.

There's 2 that stick out for me and they're - Lloyd and Stokes.

102 off 85 doesn't look that special now but in those days it certainly was. Big Clive came in with the W Indies in trouble and by the standards of the time, he took a top attack apart. Lloyd was such a powerful player - we was a monster of a man, he could brutalise an attack.

Stokes' innings was very different but what makes it stand out for me was the pressure it was played under.

Not only was it a home WC final against a very good side, but he was also playing against the history of England's 3 lost finals.

This was our time to win, to banish our precious failures and finally bring the WC home.

We were the best team in the world and it looked like we were going to fail at the final hurdle again.

Stokes' innings wasn't fluent, the pitch saw to that, but by sheer will power, belligerence and a never say die attitude he got the job done via the super over.

I don't think you could play an ODI innings under more pressure.
Wow some great firsthand experience thanks for sharing.
 

Socerer 01

International Captain
Stokes was easily under the same amount of pressure if not more. If Dhoni went, India could still have won. If Stokes went, game over for England.
i meant the pressure outside the pitch. in the match Stokes was under more pressure, I’ll admit that

i would not say game over though, England batted very deep in the world cup. they had Rashid at 10 who has fc centuries
 

Top