Haha, d'oh - I didn't pick up on it either and then used it myself to reply.And yes, before some smart**** comes in, I know there's XV players in a rugby team...![]()
No. Bulls in 2002 went winless.Will Lions be the first team in S12/14 history to not win a game all season?
Dissapointing. Resting a few key players i could understand but pretty much everyone is not in the spirit of the game.Been confirmed actually - 14 changes from last week's team that faced the Crusaders with Potgieter the only player retained. Bit ridiculous IMO. For the record their side for the weekend is:
Very varied though. No place-kicker for example.It's still a pretty solid 2nd XV though.
And the Tahs did what the Bulls did back in 2002. Ended up losing their last game of the season (96!-19) and in their home S/F when the big boys came back, the Brumbies put 50 on them.Exactly, its certainly not the worst second XI though I doubt the Stormers will have too much difficulty securing a win and home semi-final. I can't disagree about your final point either - for instance I remember the Crusaders essentially fielded a second team against the Lions earlier in the year - though it does frustrate me when teams field weakened teams for tactical reasons (being an All Black supporter and all).
Would be a huge shock if the Lions and Cheetahs finished anywhere other than last and second to last.
Selective quoting of predictions ftw.10 Cheetahs
To be fair I did comment that I rated the Cheetahs a better chance after their first game of the season so I somewhat backtracked on my initial prediction.Selective quoting of predictions ftw.
(Let's gloss over the fact that none of us had a ****Ing clue about the Reds. Think Athlai actually got closest overall despite picking the Bulls in sixth.)