• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Steve Smith vs Brian Lara

Who is the better test batsman?


  • Total voters
    48

BazBall21

International Captain
Smith hasn't faced as many ATGs as Lara but he's faced strong attacks in England, India, New Zealand, South Africa and conquered each of them. Lara wasn't great in England and New Zealand. And against great bowlers, he was a lot better at home than away.

He won't have enough longevity to be called an ATG but the version of Bumrah that Smith faced was a great bowler too. Better than Rabada who you included.
 

subshakerz

International Coach
Smith hasn't faced as many ATGs as Lara but he's faced strong attacks in England, India, New Zealand, South Africa and conquered each of them. Lara wasn't great in England and New Zealand. And against great bowlers, he was a lot better at home than away.

He won't have enough longevity to be called an ATG but the version of Bumrah that Smith faced was a great bowler too. Better than Rabada who you included.
Bumrah wasn't at full fitness in 2020/21.
 

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
When you base your opinion on "seen", do you mean eye test or aesthetics? That would never do justice to Steve Smith.
I base my opinion on the fact that I think Lara would be able to score more runs consistently everywhere against all types of bowlers.
 

_00_deathscar

International Regular
For you, my man, you'll get the sneak peak at the whole spreadsheet. :thumbsup:

Answering your question directly, Lara > Gavaskar > Hayden, is how it would go in my mind.
If inconsistency is the reason you don’t rate Sachin that highly, how do you rate the guy that most consider marginally worse than him, many consider him the equal, and some consider him marginally better - a player who was most certainly less consistent - as better than him?
 
Last edited:

OverratedSanity

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Smith's peak was from 2014 to 2019. The rise in pace standards was from 2018 onwards.

Most of Smith's peak was against goodish attacks and scoring heavily at home. The only exception was SA which had worldclass pacers in this time.
Smith had two big away series against ATG level opposition in Steyn/Philander/Morkel in 2014 and Ashwin/Jadeja (who are ATG level in India) in 2017.

Lara did face more atg level bowlers in terms of the sheer count but Smith has arguably has had just as much success against difficult attacks tbh. Lara was sporadically impressive but inconsistent against Donald/two Ws.
 

subshakerz

International Coach
Smith had two big away series against ATG level opposition in Steyn/Philander/Morkel in 2014 and Ashwin/Jadeja (who are ATG level in India) in 2017.

Lara did face more atg level bowlers in terms of the sheer count but Smith has arguably has had just as much success against difficult attacks tbh. Lara was sporadically impressive but inconsistent against Donald/two Ws.
Yeah my sense is Smith would do better against more ATGs had he faced them than Lara.
 

Slifer

International Captain
Lara at his absolute best would still struggle against Wasim, Waqar and Donald IMO. He had limits.
He was not unique here as we've discussed at length. Sachin struggled just as much vs said bowlers unless you can prove otherwise.

And Lara never faced Donald at his absolute best. He faced Donald in '98 when he was already in the middle of his slump brought on by a myriad of reasons. He faced the Ws in that same period. (96-2001).

Lara's peak was from about 1992 to 1996. The one time he faced Ws, he averaged 43, which is more than his chief rival ever managed against them.
 

subshakerz

International Coach
He was not unique here as we've discussed at length. Sachin struggled just as much vs said bowlers unless you can prove otherwise.
No, having watched Tendulkar during his career, it is clear that Tendulkar didn't struggle against them. He just didn't thrive against them. Whereas Lara clearly had issues facing certain pacers in particular series. We don't need to rehash it.

And Lara never faced Donald at his absolute best. He faced Donald in '98 when he was already in the middle of his slump brought on by a myriad of reasons. He faced the Ws in that same period. (96-2001).

Lara's peak was from about 1992 to 1996. The one time he faced Ws, he averaged 43, which is more than his chief rival ever managed against them.
Injuries are an excuse but poor form is no excuse. And it is a chicken and egg, was he in poor form because of facing these guys, or did poor form stop him from scoring against them.

Yes but these overall averages are misleading. For example, Tendulkar didn't get out to the 2Ws at all when he faced them in the late 90s. He never had a series where he consistently struggled against these pacers like Lara did against the 2W in 97, McGrath in 96 and Donald in 98.

Tendulkar can be blamed for not prospering more against them though, but having watched him, he didn't struggle against them particularly. Lara had more problems.
 
Last edited:

Top