kyear2
Hall of Fame Member
So back to Imran, Smali just said he's the GOAT after Bradman.I have to ask, do you agree with Subz that Sachin is a better/greater than Imran? And if yes why? Because it's clear as day to me than Imrans better.
I just presented the argument for Warne over him. Not even going to try to argue Sobers, because it's obvious to any one with any amount of objectively.
@subshakerz says he prefers to rate Imran between '74 and '88. This is as a bowler and an all rounder.
We've already covered his bowling numbers in neutral conditions, basically 25 with a s/r of 56. That's like Wash's career, actually a bit worse, but we digress.
Think we all also agree that Hadlee is easily the better bowler compared to Imran. Don't think that's controversial at all.
When we look at Imran's batting numbers during that time, again the period Subz has suggested, his average is 32 with a rpi of 27.
Hadlee, the much better bowler, has a batting average of 27, which breaks down to a rpi of 23.
4 runs with the bat is enough to over ride the bowling advantage that Hadlee has?
This argument where the 8th best bowler is somehow the 3rd best cricketer based on inflated lower order batting is wild to me.