Lillian Thomson
Hall of Fame Member
It's not.Not sure if that's a joke or not.
It's not.Not sure if that's a joke or not.
Indeed, it shows the fear factor Bradman held over them - man for man that England side was almost certainly stronger than Australia and would certainly have had a better than even chance of victory, and yet so intimidated were they by the fact that one man might score 900 runs against them again that they felt the need to resort to Bodyline to be sure.Not sure if that's a joke or not but it would be fascinating to know whether England could have beaten Australia without Bodyline, with such a strong side you'd think they would have been an excellent chance.
UAE 1996 vs West Indies 1984?Is that the UAE team when the captain didn't where a helmet against Alan Donald, who hit him in the head?
Yes. If only for the scene where Neil Harvey walks out and Ponting signals to Tait and Lee to warm up, pointing to his chin.I would like to see the Invincibles Vs. the Ponting Ashes team of 06/07.
I'm sure Miller and Lindwall would be more than happy to return the favourYes. If only for the scene where Neil Harvey walks out and Ponting signals to Tait and Lee to warm up, pointing to his chin.
From what I've seen/read/heard, neither where anywhere near as quick so unless they wanted to get some themselves (as Lindwall batted top-8, he was probably immune from the fast-bowler's union), they might be a bit more judicious.I'm sure Miller and Lindwall would be more than happy to return the favour![]()
Hmm, when it comes to intimidatory bowling I don't think Lee and Tait would be in same league as Lindwall and Miller, from what I've heard. Obviously bouncer laws, more protection etc will mean we'll never know and the current pair are at a disadvatage in that regard. Happy to be corrected here though.From what I've seen/read/heard, neither where anywhere near as quick so unless they wanted to get some themselves (as Lindwall batted top-8, he was probably immune from the fast-bowler's union), they might be a bit more judicious.
What about another World XI v Australia series.Battle of the Shanes: (3 Match Series)
Bond vs. Watson
MOTM: The Physio
MOTS: The Chiro
Yes. If only for the scene where Neil Harvey walks out and Ponting signals to Tait and Lee to warm up, pointing to his chin.
I'm sure Miller and Lindwall would be more than happy to return the favour![]()
Lindwall was genuinely express in his earlier days, particularly in the years immediately after the Second World War, though as his career went on he modified himself into a masterful fast-medium bowler still capable of producing shock speed. Pace was never as important to his success, though, as to many others of his ilk due to his craft and intelligence. Len Hutton once said that Lindwall was the fastest bowler he ever faced, but that “he had the subtleties of a slow bowler’s mind.”From what I've seen/read/heard, neither where anywhere near as quick so unless they wanted to get some themselves (as Lindwall batted top-8, he was probably immune from the fast-bowler's union), they might be a bit more judicious.
Lol that's a pisser.Battle of the Shanes: (3 Match Series)
Bond vs. Watson
MOTM: The Physio
MOTS: The Chiro
I wouldn't fancy my chances of seeing that series.Bradmans Invinsibles vs One of Steve Waughs sides
Has oft frustrated me that one of the strongest sides England have ever put out resorted to illicit tactics and will hence be remembered better for that than their brilliance.Not sure if that's a joke or not but it would be fascinating to know whether England could have beaten Australia without Bodyline, with such a strong side you'd think they would have been an excellent chance.