BoyBrumby
Englishman
Couple of points aren't true there:It doesn't matter. Pothas, van Jaarsveld et cetera have represented South Africa but could play for England tomorrow.
If cricket was like football or rugby, South Africa would routinely play Zimbabwe and Kenya, where everyone will get capped.
And Trott would ineligible under those sports rules, as he represented RSA U19's in an ICC event. Same goes for Kieswetter.
1) van Jaarseveld couldn't play for us tomorrow because he's not a British or Irish citizen. Pothas originally came over on his Greek passport (which meant he was regarded as local for EU employment law purpoese, but not eligible for England selection even when he'd done 4 years residence) but subsequently took out British citizenship, so is now available were the selectors so minded.
2) Playing age-group international union doesn't mean you aren't eligible for another country at full level. Matt Stevens played for SA in an Under-21 World Cup and was propping for us until his coke ban & Riki Flutey played for the (winning) NZ Under-19 team World Cup team in 1999. Interestingly (or perhaps not) Flutey wouldn't be eligible for England were he a cricketer because he's not a British subject.
Pfft. The Irish football team has been full of plastic paddies for decades, in fact the joke was that FAI stood for Find An Irishman. Do you discount Ray Houghton's goal against us in the 1988 European Championship because he's not Irish?Don't you think it detracts from victory at all? What if you're touring South Africa and getting stuffed, then KP and Trott put on a 200 run partnership and win you the game?
I dunno how the South Africans view the whole thing, but I know that if England played Ireland and Eoin Morgan and Ed Joyce hit big tons to win the game for England, I wouldn't feel like we'd been beaten. Not at all.
And I can't understand how England fans could feel like they'd beaten us either.
If someone's English enough for the team it's good enough for me.