• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Saeed Ajmal reported for chucking

Richard

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
You can't. There is not a hope of finding the flexion of bowlers to any small, precise rounded number in-match.

I'd be surprised if you could get it to a rounded figure of more than 10 degrees. That is, 0-10, 10-20, 20-30 (I'd hope precious few bowlers ever go more than that in-match).
 
Naumaan

Naumaan

First Class Debutant
Saeed Ajmal's bowling action is perfectly alright!!!
atleast now ICC has cleared him lol
so now people shouldn't say he has suspected bowling action
 
SJS

SJS

Hall of Fame Member
Long live Mr Sunil Gavaskar and the 'deeds' of the Technical Committee he once headed. :dry:
 
SJS

SJS

Hall of Fame Member
SJS said:
Long live Mr Sunil Gavaskar and the 'deeds' of the Technical Committee he once headed. :dry:
Click to expand...
Naumaan said:
??????????????????????
Click to expand...
Richard said:
:huh:
Click to expand...
chaminda_00 said:
????????????????????????
Click to expand...
Looks like clarifications are in order.

It was the ICC Technical committee that came with the new "law" on what constitutes a thrown/illegal delivery. I had written here, on this forum then that we will see an increase in number of youngsters with suspect action and in the last two-three years have been stunned at the kind of bowling actions I have seen in club nets in Delhi and Bombay.

I think the cricket committee headed by Gavaskar is directly responsible for this.
 
F

funnygirl

State Regular
SJS said:
Looks like clarifications are in order.

It was the ICC Technical committee that came with the new "law" on what constitutes a thrown/illegal delivery. I had written here, on this forum then that we will see an increase in number of youngsters with suspect action and in the last two-three years have been stunned at the kind of bowling actions I have seen in club nets in Delhi and Bombay.

I think the cricket committee headed by Gavaskar is directly responsible for this.
Click to expand...
The things are two dimensional and three dimensional. For certain bowlers we need special glasses to see their actual action.

In ur opinion more and more three dimensional bowlers in the domestic circuit ?
 
BoyBrumby

BoyBrumby

Englishman
Migara said:
Your eyes surely giving you the right old illusion. Don't let it become a hallucination.
Click to expand...
Naumaan said:
Saeed Ajmal's bowling action is perfectly alright!!!
atleast now ICC has cleared him lol
so now people shouldn't say he has suspected bowling action
Click to expand...
Steady on chaps, the verdict wasn't exactly a complete vindication. Dave Richardson said,

"Ajmal can continue to bowl in international cricket on the basis he uses an action consistent to that used in the latest independent analysis of his action."

which to my reading means he must bowl in anger how he bowled in the lab to avoid a retesting.
 
The Masterplan

The Masterplan

U19 Debutant
Migara said:
Your eyes surely giving you the right old illusion. Don't let it become a hallucination.
Click to expand...
If his action was clean why was it reported as suspicious in the first place then? It's like saying James Anderson chucks it, when he clearly doesn't. If there is hints of doubt then something usually isn't ok.
 
Naumaan

Naumaan

First Class Debutant
The Masterplan said:
If his action was clean why was it reported as suspicious in the first place then? It's like saying James Anderson chucks it, when he clearly doesn't. If there is hints of doubt then something usually isn't ok.
Click to expand...
Well if someone Bowls DOOSRA , these days they all start shouting
 
Naumaan

Naumaan

First Class Debutant
BoyBrumby said:
Steady on chaps, the verdict wasn't exactly a complete vindication. Dave Richardson said,

"Ajmal can continue to bowl in international cricket on the basis he uses an action consistent to that used in the latest independent analysis of his action."

which to my reading means he must bowl in anger how he bowled in the lab to avoid a retesting.
Click to expand...
i can't beleive it, it means he will not bowl with the action he used in lab, he will be checked again in the lab & he will bowl again the same he did last time in lab
 
Migara

Migara

International Coach
The Masterplan said:
If his action was clean why was it reported as suspicious in the first place then? It's like saying James Anderson chucks it, when he clearly doesn't. If there is hints of doubt then something usually isn't ok.
Click to expand...
That's why it is called an illusion.

"An illusion is a distortion of the senses, revealing how the brain normally organizes and interprets sensory stimulation. While illusions distort reality, they are generally shared by most people.["
 
Naumaan

Naumaan

First Class Debutant
migara said:
that's why it is called an illusion.

"an illusion is a distortion of the senses, revealing how the brain normally organizes and interprets sensory stimulation. While illusions distort reality, they are generally shared by most people.["
Click to expand...
are you a professor?
 
Naumaan

Naumaan

First Class Debutant
Migara said:
Nah, no chance for that
Click to expand...
well it looks like you're
lol
by the way Saeed Ajmal has only few years left at International level
maybe 3 or 4 at most
so doesn't matter alot
but he's good in ODI'S & T20
he'll be useful in 2011 world cup along with Afridi & Abdul Rehman(if he's selected)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Top