TBF to you Brah, you have been quite clear throughout this thread that you are not saying the quotas are wrong, nor justified........but you are calling them as you perceive than as racial inequality.Didn't see this.
Back on topic, I think you might be confused by someone saying there is "inequality" in a specific environment and assuming they mean there is "inequality" in the country in general.
Saying that there is racial "inequality" in the selection process of the national cricket team, isn't controversial, or "reprehensible", it's a simple statement of fact.
On the other hand, saying that this means there is racial inequality (against Whites) in the country of South Africa, or even in South African cricket, is very debatable. Perhaps "reprehensible".
One does not necessarily mean the other.
Summarised pretty well exactly what I've been trying to say throughout this thread.TBF to you Brah, you have been quite clear throughout this thread that you are not saying the quotas are wrong, nor justified........but you are calling them as you perceive than as racial inequality.
I guess I can't really argue with that........because in the simplest terms that's what they are. But IMO this is a massively complex issue that can't simply be brought down to the simplest terms...........there is so much more at stake here than a few white cricketers not getting a fair go, and I don't deny for a second that they aren't.
Obviously you think it is an easy thing to fix then? What obvious things have they been missing?Its funny it takes a cricinfo author to raise the issue of players leaving.
When will Lorgat and the SA Board address concerns and secondly put policies in place to fix what has turned into panic stations.
Next elections in SA are only scheduled for 2019.The South African government talked up quotas or transformation,as their is apparently elections coming up.
Really the South African Board have to own this problem,their silence is deafening.
no doubt. I can understand the players' reasoning for leaving though.What I mean to say, so a small handful of white cricketers maybe missing out, and people could perceive that to be racial inequality..........but that is so minute in importance compared to the inequality that exists in so many other massively more important facets of life.
What should happen though? Whites should be stripped of their assets etc?Well here's something for you to consider............
View attachment 23078
That's a photo of Cape Town by the way, taken last year. I'm sure I don't need to spell out which side of the road is the white neighbourhood.
Now please........ tell us more about this inequality against whites.
Mate, I don't mind shouting down the likes of Tetanus when they are spouting ignorant crap.....but I would never dream of arguing these points with a South African who is living this stuff day in day out and who has insurmountable more knowledge than I on the historic and current situation.What should happen though? Whites should be stripped of their assets etc?
Inequality is actually higher among black people than in the country as a whole (measured by the Gini co-efficient).
I support redress, but saying 'x numbers of your playing XI must be black' is not redress.
This would really suck if true though. Surely, his recent success will have changed his mind?Kyle Abbott expected to shelve South Africa for Hampshire deal | Cricket | ESPN Cricinfo
This is really sad, Abbott who looks like one of the best bowlers to be uncovered in some time, is going to go Kolpak and play County Cricket because he doesn't fancy his long term career potential staying in RSA.
Doesn't seem so.This would really suck if true though. Surely, his recent success will have changed his mind?
Yeah, it's a very difficult situation.Mate, I don't mind shouting down the likes of Tetanus when they are spouting ignorant crap.....but I would never dream of arguing these points with a South African who is living this stuff day in day out and who has insurmountable more knowledge than I on the historic and current situation.
I'll attempt to explain my pov but please don't think I'm challenging yours, because I'm in no position to do so.
For a start I'm not even necessarily pro quotas for sport, purely because I don't know if they achieve the goals that they set out to...........but (as I have said on here before) If they can get one black family from the wrong side of the street onto the other then I've got an open mind to them. Honestly, I don't think the success of a cricket team is the major concern here, sacrifices have to made by some people in order for real, tangible redress to happen.......and it will take years, probably hundreds before the blacks are on a true level playing field. And I don't think this is about retribution either, I don't believe the white South Africans should be "punished" even though it may feel like it..........but a majority population was held down for 50 years and now they need a leg up and it doesn't seem too far fetched to me that this leg up may need to come from these sorts of artificial, manipulative measures.
Yeah, this does tend to happen. We have caste based reservations in Indian colleges and people with rich financial backgrounds, but historically repressed castes often get a leg up.Yeah, it's a very difficult situation.
Just something that should be highlighted is that of the two current black players in the side - Rabada and Bavuma - are both from solid middle class backgrounds. Bavuma's dad was an editor at a number of big South African newspapers and Rabada's dad is a brain surgeon (and both went to private schools).
So both would probably have done ok in life without affirmative action anyway.
Which is the problem - affirmative action and other redress schemes already benefits the 'insiders' and doesn't really do anything for most people living in grinding poverty and in shacks or rural areas.