wahindiawah
Banned
Yet he cannot retain his place in test side, and that has something to do with his poor performance!Arrow said:How long is lees run up? Hes as fast as shoaib and can maintain his speed over longer spells.
Yet he cannot retain his place in test side, and that has something to do with his poor performance!Arrow said:How long is lees run up? Hes as fast as shoaib and can maintain his speed over longer spells.
I heard him on television a month back saying he can and will bowl even faster.wahindiawah said:I don't think that is the case.He was obsessed with breaking the 100 mph record in the past but after breaking it he seems to have no interest atall to even bowl near 160 KPH.
But he talks alot, is a self-loving person and often talk crap.SJS said:I heard him on television a month back saying he can and will bowl even faster.
I hope so because it is a great sight to see him bowling to the best batsmen in the world and bowling well !wahindiawah said:But he talks alot, is a self-loving person and often talk crap.
However the important thing is that lately(since some time) i haven't seen him trying to break the 100 MPH record. Also Shoaib has said a number of times that he's now more interested in taking wkts then bowler faster.
Or maybe you should've mentioned someone who was consistently successful over a long time.wahindiawah said:I was unbaised, i gave the example of Pathan as he just came into my mind, maybe i should had mentioned Harmison, that would have made everyone happy!
Nah, that has nothing to do with the topic.marc71178 said:Or maybe you should've mentioned someone who was consistently successful over a long time.
Because Harmison's good attitude sure has helped him in his last 9 Tests, hasn't it?wahindiawah said:I was unbaised, i gave the example of Pathan as he just came into my mind, maybe i should had mentioned Harmison, that would have made everyone happy!
Well. Even I was taken aback by Pathan's name but this clears it.wahindiawah said:Nah, that has nothing to do with the topic.
I had all the reason to mention Pathan. Pathan has won praises from former Pak cric like Imran and Akram for his talent,good hard work positive attitude .Interestingly the 2 former players have been targetting Akhtar coz of his attitude so much so that Akhtar has asked Akram as to why can't he encourage him (like he encourages Pathan) for a change.
SJS said:Well. Even I was taken aback by Pathan's name but this clears it.
When it comes to willingness to learn from others and try to improve, there is no better example than Irfan Pathan.
Pakistan do need Shoiabh... If he can learn to control his behaviour(on and off the field)and Aim at bowling Accurately(Rather than express)then he would be more effective......amokk1 said:Last time when Aktar toured Australia back in 1999/2000, he has Wasim and Waqar and Saqlain to bowl with him. He only took 6 wickets in 3 matches.
Not every impressive. But, it reflects even when top class bowlers do give him support....he still can't take wickets. I guess it's a pretty poor compairson to make for one series.
BUT, He is all talk, no action. Wasim and Waqar are correct. Look at the scorecards of the 1999 series and see how Wasim and Waqar got more wickets them him. Pakistan don't need him. THey got better bowlers.
btw to my Aussies friends out there....is slippers called phongs or thongs ?
lol
What rubbish are you talking? That tour happened to be the first of of Aus by Akhtar, Akhtar wasn't able to adjust to the condition and as such he struggled.You can't just give one particular example to suit ur example.Also if i remember correctly Akram did do wonders in that tour and Waqar wasn't even played in all the matches as Akram didn't like him.amokk1 said:Last time when Aktar toured Australia back in 1999/2000, he has Wasim and Waqar and Saqlain to bowl with him. He only took 6 wickets in 3 matches.
Not every impressive. But, it reflects even when top class bowlers do give him support....he still can't take wickets. I guess it's a pretty poor compairson to make for one series.
lol
Then name the better pacers?amokk1 said:BUT, He is all talk, no action. Wasim and Waqar are correct. Look at the scorecards of the 1999 series and see how Wasim and Waqar got more wickets them him. Pakistan don't need him. THey got better bowlers.
lol
Smoking that crack yet again?Richard said:Pathan, incidentally, could learn how to bowl well in Test-cricket.
A positive attitude is all well and good, but you need the ability first - and as of yet, Pathan hasn't got that.
so...not harmy then?marc71178 said:Or maybe you should've mentioned someone who was consistently successful over a long time.