I was watching some old highlights when i couldn't sleep last night, and it hit me how warped the stories of cricket matches can get over time.
The first was the second test of the 2005 Ashes. In my head, this is where Ponting made a huge balls-up at the toss and England took the attack to Australia successfully, tearing their bowling apart. What I'd forgotten was several near-misses and dropped catches, not to mention Trescothick being caught off a no-ball early in his innings. Not only that, but England finished the day on 407 all out on a pitch that was still very flat and in interviews the morning after, nine out of the ten pundits predicted an Australian first-innings lead. England were looking like they'd hit their way to a slightly-below-par total by being overly aggressive, and were relying on their bowlers to bail them out.
The second was the first test of the SA-England series at Lords this summer. Most people thought after the match that Smith had made a mistake at the toss, SA had chucked pies for two straight days while England tonned up then ground their way out of trouble on the last two days.
What I'd forgotten was that on the opening morning, Strauss and Cook played and missed more than any two opener i've ever seen. The ball beat the bat about twenty times in the first session alone. Pietersen was centimetres away from being run out for a duck and Bell edged between the slips on 4. SA still bowled like ****, but England's batting was a lot less convincing than i remembered and Smith's decision at the toss was probably actually just about the correct call.
I'm wondering now how many other innings and matches have been distorted in my head into something completely different to reality...