subshakerz
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
They only average the same because Tendulkar averaged less as a teen for a phase.I'm pretty sure Sachin and Viv average about the same without Sachin bashing 2000s Zimbabwe and Bangladesh, which were worse than a lot of county sides even and simply not international status, both definitely should've scored more given the type of talent they had, for reference, I think both are far more talented than post War Hutton or Jack Kallis.
But anyways there isnt anything wrong with Vivs overall record. I also don't think Tendulkar underachieved. Viv perhaps underachieved because he had the tendency to get bored and lose his wicket which perhaps accounts for relatively less tons (speculation). He could have averaged 2-3 points more if he had more hunger for runs but it's still a mostly flawless record.