• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

**Official** World XI v Asia XI

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
Tim said:
You obviously didn't see Gilchrist play yesterday did you Richard?
Yep - boring, monotonous, same-same-same thing.
If he'd have skied one, though - great.
 

Scaly piscine

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Tim said:
What I find interesting is the makeup of the World XI bowling attack.
McGrath, Gough & Cairns will presumably be the 3 pace-bowlers followed by either Bravo (if he's selected) or Vettori & Warne...with Gayle as the part-timer also.

Will McGrath, Gough & Cairns be able to knock over this Asian selection?..im not so sure.
I'm not sure Cairns would bowl his full quota anyway, Gayle is more than a part-time bowler in ODIs.
 

Mr Casson

Cricketer Of The Year
Richard said:
Yep - boring, monotonous, same-same-same thing.
If he'd have skied one, though - great.
When Adam Gilchrist retires, sometime along the line you're going to wish you watched more of him; you won't see anyone hit the ball to all parts of the wicket, with all the shots in the book, so cleanly, so hard, so indiscriminately as he does. You might think you've seen slogging before, but you may never see an Adam Gilchrist again.
 
Last edited:

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
The fewer players who bat like Gilchrist, the more I'll enjoy the game.
I simply don't like seeing the ball hit like that, no matter how "clean, hard and indescriminately" it's done (indeed the final is very much a turn-off).
 

Mr Casson

Cricketer Of The Year
Richard said:
The fewer players who bat like Gilchrist, the more I'll enjoy the game.
I simply don't like seeing the ball hit like that, no matter how "clean, hard and indescriminately" it's done (indeed the final is very much a turn-off).
That's an ultra-purist attitude to have towards the game. Why can't Gilchrist absolutely murdering an attack be entertaining? You seem to like a strategic approach to cricket, and there's nothing more strategic than Gilchrist's way of play; it's just that he's the only one who can execute it.
 

Adamc

Cricketer Of The Year
Richard said:
The fewer players who bat like Gilchrist, the more I'll enjoy the game.
I simply don't like seeing the ball hit like that, no matter how "clean, hard and indescriminately" it's done (indeed the final is very much a turn-off).
You don't make 13 Test centuries by being indiscriminate.
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
Mr Casson said:
That's an ultra-purist attitude to have towards the game. Why can't Gilchrist absolutely murdering an attack be entertaining? You seem to like a strategic approach to cricket, and there's nothing more strategic than Gilchrist's way of play; it's just that he's the only one who can execute it.
Exactly - I don't like anomalies.
It's like - he plays a way no-one has a right to play - consistently.
It just baffles me how much he gets away with it.
Sorry if that seems "purist" or whatsits, but that's just the way it is.
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
Adamc said:
You don't make 13 Test centuries by being indiscriminate.
Yes, I know that, but the point is it looks so indiscriminate. Sometimes, anyway - there are innings (like the SCG one against England) where he scores at 120-per-100 despite barely hazarding an unconventional stroke (an indicator of how poor the bowling was).
 

Mr Casson

Cricketer Of The Year
Richard said:
Exactly - I don't like anomalies.
It's like - he plays a way no-one has a right to play - consistently.
It just baffles me how much he gets away with it.
Sorry if that seems "purist" or whatsits, but that's just the way it is.
The best players are anomalies! Everyone else is just average, normal.
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
Gilchrist is more than just "one of the best players" - there's no-one remotely like him.
Just think for a second - a Test-average of 53 (or so) at a strike-rate of 70 (or so).
If anyone's ever achieved that (except Bradman, of course - who achieved nearly twice the average) I'll be amazed.
 

Mr Casson

Cricketer Of The Year
Richard said:
Gilchrist is more than just "one of the best players" - there's no-one remotely like him.
Just think for a second - a Test-average of 53 (or so) at a strike-rate of 70 (or so).
If anyone's ever achieved that (except Bradman, of course - who achieved nearly twice the average) I'll be amazed.
So why the hell don't you like him?

And his strike rate is over 80.
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
I'd probably like him if he was English.
Just call it jealousy - something I'm normally not accusable of.
It just irks me - he epitomises the "we can do anything" nature of the Australia current (not in his personal agenda, I've nothing but admiration for his walking and humility - simply in the way he bats). And I don't like that.
 

Mr Casson

Cricketer Of The Year
Richard said:
I'd probably like him if he was English.
Just call it jealousy - something I'm normally not accusable of.
It just irks me - he epitomises the "we can do anything" nature of the Australia current (not in his personal agenda, I've nothing but admiration for his walking and humility - simply in the way he bats). And I don't like that.
Hahaha, fair enough explanation; it makes sense. :)
 

Craig

World Traveller
With a second match to be played in March where are people predicating the the second game to be played (either in India or Sri Lanka), for the purpose of being able to get a bigger crowd - thus more money I will go for Eden Gardens in Kolkat(t)a.
 

Gangster

U19 12th Man
Richard said:
To be one of the greatest games in history it would need some competetive meaning for mine.
I might also add that a slogfest such as that which those two would probably engage in would actually denegrate, not raise, the quality of viewing.
Did you smoke a lot of crack the morning you posted that? More than your normal daily roast I'd wager.
 

Dydl

International Debutant
Apparently Akhtar has withdrawn from the match with ankle injuries? Confirm?
 

Mister Wright

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Mr Casson said:
That's an ultra-purist attitude to have towards the game. Why can't Gilchrist absolutely murdering an attack be entertaining? You seem to like a strategic approach to cricket, and there's nothing more strategic than Gilchrist's way of play; it's just that he's the only one who can execute it.

Yeah, but it kinda gets frustrating when Gilchrist turns a contest into a slaughter.
 

Mister Wright

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Dydl said:
Apparently Akhtar has withdrawn from the match with ankle injuries? Confirm?
I wouldn't be surprised, he didn't look his best in the last test, and will need to freshen up for the one dayers.
 

Top