yep i said it, he looked every bit like thatmarc71178 said:Well someone did say he was bowling like when he had that 7fer!
throw Collins in their along with 3 other tearaways, but not Collymore Australia would play him all day...Mr Mxyzptlk said:*cough* Pedro Collins *cough* Corey Collymore *cough*
Collymore is the second best West Indian seam bowler in the region, after Collins. In fact, on form he's arguably better than Collins. He's more accurate than any other bowlers we've got, has more heart than most and actually does something with the ball.aussie said:throw Collins in their along with 3 other tearaways, but not Collymore Australia would play him all day...
I never said Australia would smash him all about, I'm not doubting he is WI most accurate bowler nor he is the 2nd best in the WI, but what i'm saying if they were going to play a test a perth & the attack was Collins/Edwards/Best/Lawson it would be interesting...Mr Mxyzptlk said:I keenly await your explanation as to why Australia would smash him to all parts.
He'd negotiated Murali impressively to the point and had played a wonderful straight drive off Malinga in the previous over. He looked well-set and then suddenly got the urge to charge down the track at a regulation Murali delivery. He swung over the top of it and was stumped by a mile.marc71178 said:Was it another "mind the windows" effort?
Had he been dismissed by a good delivery or good cricket, that would have applied. As it stands, he deserves all the blame he gets. He showed he can bat and should have stuck around with his captain with intentions of winning a match rather than breaking windows.cricket player said:Will you should be happy that he scored 27 to save west indies from humiliation dismissals doesnt.
Pace is not everything, even on the WACA surface. Edwards and Lawson would give you your pace. Collins gives you your consistency and swing. I'd take Collymore over Best and Powell any day of the week. I'd be more willing to grant Powell the chance though, as he seems to be maturing. He needs to get fit though.aussie said:I never said Australia would smash him all about, I'm not doubting he is WI most accurate bowler nor he is the 2nd best in the WI, but what i'm saying if they were going to play a test a perth & the attack was Collins/Edwards/Best/Lawson it would be interesting...
Poor shot selection means poor temperament.Mr Mxyzptlk said:Had he been dismissed by a good delivery or good cricket, that would have applied. As it stands, he deserves all the blame he gets. He showed he can bat and should have stuck around with his captain with intentions of winning a match rather than breaking windows.
In the days of the legendary 4-prong it wasMr Mxyzptlk said:Pace is not everything.
No it wasn't. None of those bowlers relied solely on pace. It wasn't four Brett Lees about. It was four quality bowlers with the pace to push a point home.aussie said:In the days of the legendary 4-prong it was
Poor shot selection doesn't not necessarily mean poor temperament. Brian Lara has been out to attrocious shots several times over the course of his career. I dare you to call him a poor player. Tino Best clearly has the talent to deal with quality bowling, he just hasn't matured enough with that talent as yet.Pratyush said:Poor shot selection means poor temperament.
A lack of ability to play balls means poor talent.
Either of them means poor cricketers. Its no use blaming a player. It show angst of the fans of lack of more temperamental/talented players.
Maybe they didn't rely solely on pace but most of the time that was all they needed to get opposition batsmen out, and oi dont be down on Lee now, he's has matured it to better bowler he doesn't rely solely on pace anymore.Mr Mxyzptlk said:No it wasn't. None of those bowlers relied solely on pace. It wasn't four Brett Lees about. It was four quality bowlers with the pace to push a point home.
Obviously poor shot selection once in a while doesnot mean poor temperament for a player but if there is repeated poor shot selections it paramounts to poor temperament.Mr Mxyzptlk said:Poor shot selection doesn't not necessarily mean poor temperament. Brian Lara has been out to attrocious shots several times over the course of his career. I dare you to call him a poor player. Tino Best clearly has the talent to deal with quality bowling, he just hasn't matured enough with that talent as yet.
It was a useful asset, but it was not what alone got them their massive success, as you've admitted. Tell that to McGrath and Pollock.aussie said:Maybe they didn't rely solely on pace but most of the time that was all they needed to get opposition batsmen out
Thanks for that. You just proved my point beautifully.aussie said:and oi dont be down on Lee now, he's has matured it to better bowler he doesn't rely solely on pace anymore.
I've no idea why you're trying to start an argument when I never referred to Best's bowling in this discussion. Previously when I have referred to it, I've been very clear that he's not up to scratch at the moment. Read first, gripe later.Pratyush said:Re : Tino Best - why should a player with inconsistent bowling, bowling so many deliveries which can be despatched to the boundary, bowling poorly be conisdered any thing worthy just because he has some talent. Best is clearly not cut for international cricket at the moement despite the talent. Let him develop his bowling, remove the 'immaturity' as you termed 'he hasnt matured enough' and then come to play international cricket.
Good old Tino - a legend IMO!Mr Mxyzptlk said:He'd negotiated Murali impressively to the point and had played a wonderful straight drive off Malinga in the previous over. He looked well-set and then suddenly got the urge to charge down the track at a regulation Murali delivery. He swung over the top of it and was stumped by a mile.
In a word, ja.
I am not.We agree on Best then. Cheers.Mr Mxyzptlk said:I've no idea why you're trying to start an argument.
Definitely agree with you here. An attack of Edwards/Collins/Lawson/Collymore is the definitely the best for the West Indies. Best team's probably:Mr Mxyzptlk said:Pace is not everything, even on the WACA surface. Edwards and Lawson would give you your pace. Collins gives you your consistency and swing. I'd take Collymore over Best and Powell any day of the week. I'd be more willing to grant Powell the chance though, as he seems to be maturing. He needs to get fit though.