Yep, a nice Flintoff / Jones cameo b4 lunch maybe to push the lead to 500 and we declare.marc71178 said:And more runs for Trescothick - nice when you have that many players capable of tons!
Stage set for a Flintoff special tomorrow...
5 of the top 7 of WI are lefties, you cant pad away the ball like that and expect the umpire to not lose patience and just give them out. The last wicket only just pitched outside leg so it wasnt THAT bad of a decision.biased indian said:what is the WI plyers doing aganist giles. basically what he is doing is pitching the ball out side the legstump all that they have to do is just pad him away .but then also as the last wicket that he got the umpires might still give u out
I you're a leftie, you can't do that.biased indian said:what is the WI plyers doing aganist giles. basically what he is doing is pitching the ball out side the legstump all that they have to do is just pad him away .but then also as the last wicket that he got the umpires might still give u out
So why did he have a catch dropped then?tooextracool said:he didnt look like taking wickets at all......precisely why out of all the bowlers he bowled the least.
So you would rather I didn't change my opinion?marc71178 said:Why should this one innings be any different than the last year of consistently good performances with both bat AND ball that haven't changed your opinion?
But it does show you the lack of quality of the WI and I guess the NZ bowling and the flatness of the wickets.marc71178 said:And more runs for Trescothick - nice when you have that many players capable of tons!
Stage set for a Flintoff special tomorrow...
Agreed.Craig said:My opinion on day 3:
- Really one must be disappionted in the way Lara got out, sure Flintoff had delivered that yorker and had him unsettled the ball before, but there is no excuse to going and playing a loose shot away from the body especially from a cricketing great, but if there was to be any fairness, it was a fine catch by Thorpe.
Jacobs did the right thing by going for it himself - it should have been a relatively simple catch but he didn't move to it properly. It wouldn't have been a wide.- What is up with Ridley Jacobs? He plays a poor shot away from his body with a lack of foot movement, and then he does the cardinal sin and steps in front of Lara and stills what would be a dolly for Lara. And it wasn't as though it was going all that fast, as you dive over, not step. Had Thorpe had not have played it, he probably would have gotten a wide.
Sarwan was really the only one to play Giles convincingly I think. I imagine Bravo has very little experience against spinners, particularly left-armers. Padding it away would have been insane though.- While I am on the subject on poor batting, I can't go past Dwayne Bravo. He could claim to be a bit unlucky as the ball just clipped the off stump, and it could be argued that it was a good ball by Giles, but I think it was poor batting. I know I will probably get told that cricketers a human, but that is a defeatist attitude IMO. I think Bravo was better of playing it off the back foot, and that way he could have hit through the leg or off side, or padded the ball away and it would have been tough to be given out LBW.
Still a long way to go in the series, too hard to predict.- In that said, Ashley Giles must be a strong chance of man-of-the-series, along with Flintoff and a few others.
If he was on the back foot it would have been even more obvious where the ball was going to end up. Not offering a shot on the back foot in front of the stumps is suicide.Craig said:I think if he was on the back foot, and padded it away with his front pad, it would have created doubt for the umpire to give him out.
Craig said:So you would rather I didn't change my opinion?
You have proved it, there is no pleasing you.
Craig said:- Really one must be disappionted in the way Lara got out, sure Flintoff had delivered that yorker and had him unsettled the ball before, but there is no excuse to going and playing a loose shot away from the body especially from a cricketing great, but if there was to be any fairness, it was a fine catch by Thorpe.
Revelation said:i don't. Bravo has played for T&T and from what i have seen of him, it's more of the opposite (a batsman who can bowl). he has a few first class centuries and he hasn't played that many matches. his highest score is 197 while his best bowling isn't even close to that.
Or is it because Lara went chasing after the ball when he didn't have to play at it?marc71178 said:Because it's inconceivable that Flintoff did him with a great bit of bowling isn't it?