More evidence there.WI's batting is the equivalent of Bangladesh + Chanderpaul
Some talent there but the majority are ****ing soft and/or stupid
Up there with some of Clarke's finest efforts.Not the greatest leave.
Not quite WC07 vs. NZ standard.Up there with some of Clarke's finest efforts.
Inside the subcontinent, it would be. Outside of the subcontinent, the Bangladesh spinners would be ordinary and the West Indian pacers would be more effective. Also, and it pains me to say this, you cannot judge a team by how they play against England in England because they're just too damn good. Let's hope SA or WI later in the series can put up a fight.Bangladesh against WI would be a great series now...
First game was a draw. Second game Edwards and Bravo tonned up and WI won by 200 odd runs.Didn't the West Indies smash Bangladesh in Bangladesh about 6 months ago?
How have your friends come to this conclusion? I don't think I've ever seen Ian Bell bowl.Have a question based on a discussion with my friend; why is Trott used as a fifth bowler more than Bell? Bell looks a much better bowler to me.
Bell is a gun bowlerHow have your friends come to this conclusion? I don't think I've ever seen Ian Bell bowl.
He has bowled in a televised county game, a few ODIs and very possibly a Test, IIRC.How have your friends come to this conclusion? I don't think I've ever seen Ian Bell bowl.
He has a Test wicketHe has bowled in a televised county game, a few ODIs and very possibly a Test, IIRC.
Emphasises how significant giving away those 3 wickets has beenPitch gone flatter and flatter as the day went on, soon as the new ball got over about 20 overs there wasn't much in it. WI have dug in and England will now probably have to bat again, they'll have to work to take the rest of these WI wickets.