dinu23
International Debutant
was that a joke?parttimer said:How old were you when you took your picture for your avatar?
was that a joke?parttimer said:How old were you when you took your picture for your avatar?
parttimer said:Remember when Murali took potshots at all our bowlers implying they all chuck? No doubt Warne wins personality wise over Murali
1. Don't know- ask him why he picked OZ bowlers- maybe the vilification he received in OZ media is a reason- pointing out to them that their own 'heroes' arnt any different from himparttimer said:If everybody chucks why'd he pick Aus bowlers, esp Mcgrath who'd never said anything about him? Out of spite, revenge - not exactly posterboy behaviour. Where'd he get those figures from anyway and have they been verified?
No.dinu23 said:well its true aint it? they all chuck.
It was a smear on their careers without direct provocation. It was a pretty low act . Point is the guy is no angel either.C_C said:1. Don't know- ask him why he picked OZ bowlers- maybe the vilification he received in OZ media is a reason- pointing out to them that their own 'heroes' arnt any different from him
2. Figures can be obtained from UWA if you know the right people. I am pretty sure that if i can, so can he. Also, as far as i am aware, many of the bowlers are aware of the flexion data on other bowlers, as long as they've been either tested by UWA or ICC sanctioned folks - UWA does catalouge the data.
I would suggest with the greatest respect that, as far as Australians are concerned, Murali is FAR more sinned-against than sinner with respect to the use of the gob.parttimer said:It was a smear on their careers without direct provocation. It was a pretty low act . Point is the guy is no angel either.
Erm not really, he was stating facts. He wasn't saying other bowlers weren't as good as him or whatnot, he was saying others (and quite obviously Murali) play Zimbabwe and Bangladesh a lot more than he does.Dasa said:he's still an insecure, immature idiot who feels he has to take potshots at other bowlers.
Actually, no.dinu23 said:well its true aint it? they all chuck.
It's fact that not everyone chucked under the old regulations. Most did. I think it was Sarwan who doesn't flex his elbow at all.dinu23 said:'chuck' maybe a hard word for you. how about flexing the elbow, huh?
For the last time, read your rules- if Murali chucks, everyone chucks. If he isnt a chucker, most others arnt chuckers either.Tom Halsey said:Actually, no.
No, most, not everyone. Sarwan doesn't straighten his arm at all.C_C said:For the last time, read your rules- if Murali chucks, everyone chucks
I don't see what's anti-Murali about my view to be honest. I've got no problem with the fact that the old rules were wrong - but it was also said that not 100% everyone chucked, only 99%, there was still the odd bowler who was OK.a massive zebra said:Merry Christmas Mr Halsey - although we may disagree on this issue I do admire your persistence and loyalty.
Sorry, should have made myself more clear - I was refering to our contrasting views on the Murali vs Warne debate rather than the throwing issues.Tom Halsey said:I don't see what's anti-Murali about my view to be honest. I've got no problem with the fact that the old rules were wrong - but it was also said that not 100% everyone chucked, only 99%, there was still the odd bowler who was OK.
And Merry Christmas to you too.
Oh, fair enough.a massive zebra said:Sorry, should have made myself more clear - I was refering to our contrasting views on the Murali vs Warne debate rather than the throwing issues.
However, Christmas eve is not the time for arguments and I hope Santa brings lots of great presents for you.
Again...no. This 'everyone chucks' thing is a myth. Every player wasn't at the tournament in question so you can't draw the conclusion you've come to from that. When you say 'flexing the elbow' are we talking about hyper-extension or a bend inwards towards the shoulder and back?dinu23 said:'chuck' maybe a hard word for you. how about flexing the elbow, huh?