I thought we were debating these 2 purely as bowlers. Anyhow I understand your point and I see some merit to it. Though you might as well say that Australia> Sri Lanka because as far as I'm concerned, this trait of performing in the big games is almost certainly more of an Australian phenomenon rather than anything else. Its why they've been in every world cup final since 1996 and won the last 3.Look, I totally get why most people rate Murali ahead of Warne in ODIs. But for me; ODIs mean jack unless it's the WC. And I know who I'd take to the WC. What more as ODI players I'd much rather Warne as he is also likely to chip in twice as much with the bat negating the difference in their ER.
Been in every WC final bar three tbh.I thought we were debating these 2 purely as bowlers. Anyhow I understand your point and I see some merit to it. Though you might as well say that Australia> Sri Lanka because as far as I'm concerned, this trait of performing in the big games is almost certainly more of an Australian phenomenon rather than anything else. Its why they've been in every world cup final since 1996 and won the last 3.
If Aus win the next WC they'll have won 5/10.That just sounds crazy.Been in every WC final bar three tbh.
why do you remove the stats against teams like Bangaladesh, Zimbabwe etc? is it because without it, Warne's record looks much better than Murali's? FYI, Bangaladesh was in the final 8 last year after defeating both SA and India.
what do you mean by important wicket here? all wickets taken by warne?If we were talking about another ODI bowler apart from Warne I might agree. But in ODIs Warne had an exceptional knack of taking wickets when it was needed. Whilst conceding runs in the pursuit of taking wickets go hand in hand; I prefer a bowler who is more likely to take an important wicket than one who is going to consistently save 2-3 runs a match. And that's not to say Murali didn't take important wickets or didn't have that ability; but I rate Warne's ability to do that much higher and he certainly demonstrated that throughout his OD career - especially in WCs.
Most likely had 99 WC in mind, the ultimate for Warne, though the 96 WC match v WI at Mohali was AMAZING Warne bowling, we were gone in that match- WI were 2 down chasing a further 30 odd runs, and Warne inspired an 8 wicket collapse in no time and we won, an incredible finish. And so the ODI legend was born for Warne.what do you mean by important wicket here?
Yeah, I'd agree with that. Saqlain and Warne are also quite comparable, iirc, in terms of similar number of matches.Imo,Murali is the best Odi spinner,followed by Saqlain and then Warne.
Murali took 1 - 31 from 10 and Warne went for 58 for none off his ten (Arjuna, in particular, took to him).Interestingly,the one time both Warne and Murali faced off in a WC final,Murali's side emerged victorious(what were their individual figures?Can't remember)
I concur. I really don't see much room for debate on this one.No doubt in my mind that he is the best ODI spinner-arguably played in a tougher era,sheer longevity etc.
Yay Tom Moody, my uncle, somewhere along the line. Alas I couldnt continue the Moody name into top level cricketBowling records | One-Day Internationals | Cricinfo Statsguru | Cricinfo.com
**** off garner, mcgrath, murali, akram. you are not good enough to shine the shoes of amarnath, symonds, moody, pringle...
Yeah, remember Fleming's dramatic last overs in semi finals of both 96 and 99 world cups.Warne was obviously great but I really feared Damien Fleming out of the Aussie ODI bowlers in the '90s. Always seemed to be in the thick of things in a tight match, bowling important spells for them.
Not to forget his very first last over triumph- 8th odi in SA on the 94 tour, no way we shouldve won that one. Border gave the ball to the youngster and it paid off. Taylor did the same 2 years later in th e96 WC, then SRW in 99. Loved Flemings bowling.Yeah, remember Fleming's dramatic last overs in semi finals of both 96 and 99 world cups.
Why did he play only 20 tests btw? Good average for those 20 games!Not to forget his very first last over triumph- 8th odi in SA on the 94 tour, no way we shouldve won that one. Border gave the ball to the youngster and it paid off. Taylor did the same 2 years later in th e96 WC, then SRW in 99. Loved Flemings bowling.
My uncle > your uncle.Yay Tom Moody, my uncle, somewhere along the line. Alas I couldnt continue the Moody name into top level cricket
Chronic injury.Why did he play only 20 tests btw? Good average for those 20 games!
Plus Steve Waugh's favouritism for Brett Lee.Chronic injury.