How many fernandoes did you include?SJS said:You should have asked me. I rate him 128th in the world as a bowler and thats because I couldnt think of more than 128 bowlers
How many fernandoes did you include?SJS said:You should have asked me. I rate him 128th in the world as a bowler and thats because I couldnt think of more than 128 bowlers
Of course you do realise that he was joking?Hondo said:yeah but to call your side a bunch of cheaters by saying thet match fixing is only way we could win more than one game! Come-on that not right in any book.
There you go Hondo - stop the nonsense and get on with talking about yesterday's game . Otherwise you may not be able to post on this forum.James said:Please just stop it Hondo, you're doing yourself no favours in continuing it with Jason.
I'd rather not have to hit the ban button unless I really have too.
This didn't register before , when I said the same.marc71178 said:I would have to disagree 100% here.
Just because Jason doesn't blindly support his side, does that mean that he hasn't got a clue what he's talking about.
He's what's called a realist and can see where his side has shortcomings.
Have to agree with Blaze , it is damn boring and because I do not want to bore members of this forum I will stop this exchange right here and will not be involved in any further exchanges with Hondo.Blaze said:Get msn guys, it is boring to read.
Lostman said:i dont think SL choked, SA just played great. The last 6 overs were all yorkers, Sl managed only 1 boundary.
In similar situation most of the top teams would have won easily . The advantage is usually with the batting side when you come down to under 40 runs with 5 wickets standing and all you need is a little more than a run a ball.age_master said:they got into a position where they should have won the game though - they then blew it
his game doesn't suit the role at #8 no but i cant see anyone in the top 7 before him being replaced, so for now let him play since the postitive to that is that the so called weaker aspect of his game (bowling) will get more developing.marc71178 said:Based on what exactly?
How does his game suit that role?
ah well live with it...Prince EWS said:Thats not an answer to my question. It just seems needlessly annoying to be honest.
Maybe if they actually put their first team out, which in my ill informed eyes should probably look like this.. (dunno where Bevo went, but he's not the worst number 7 ever, maybe the best)aussie said:didn't watch the game, but glad to hear SA had one, a SRI win would not have gone down well. But i still feel australia haven't yet hit full gear in this tournament, because i strongly believe once australia come with their A-game in all departments they will be too much for either SA or SRI.
dont think australia need to go back to Bevan & Hayden at all (although dizzy may be useful but Bracken has done well) in this tournament, all is needed is that they put out their full stenght side & play like australia can play & i back them to runaway with this tournament as usual.Langeveldt said:Maybe if they actually put their first team out, which in my ill informed eyes should probably look like this.. (dunno where Bevo went, but he's not the worst number 7 ever, maybe the best)
1. Hayden
2. Jacques
3. Ponting
4. Martyn
5. Symonds
6. Gilchrist
7. Bevan
8. Hogg
9. Lee
10. Gillespie
11. McGrath
Then maybe they'll start pulling some major punches?
What, just like they did last time South Africa were in town with New Zealand?Aussie said:& i back them to runaway with this tournament as usual.
That was an awesome series. Lucky the Aussies caught Bondaphobia. I don't think they've been cured yet.Langeveldt said:What, just like they did last time South Africa were in town with New Zealand?
well their are some major differences to 2001 than now. Firstly NZ with fleming had worked out australia's top order with Bond being the axis on which that plan rotated along with some good intelligent batting relay outwitted australia, then SA just fed off NZ's success you could say.Langeveldt said:What, just like they did last time South Africa were in town with New Zealand?