KungFu_Kallis
State Captain
Because coat hangers aren't that expensiveWhy has umpire's call for impact not been done away with again?
Because coat hangers aren't that expensiveWhy has umpire's call for impact not been done away with again?
He will be able to go next weekQue shot of Bairstow at the tennis eating a sundae Constanza-like.
Yeah, if they get it wrong it massively diverts the ball to different angle. I've always agreed with Stokes that the Lyon not out decision @ Headingly in That Test was no way ripping like DRS said it was. It missed it clipping his front pad changing the directory.It's because impact has to be manually chosen as a specific frame by an operator and there can be uncertainty if the actual impact was between frames and there's been interaction between the pad and ball.
His confidence was shot by that missed stumping at Edgbaston,unfortunately England were ruthless enough to take gloves awayBairstow confidence looked low I thought throughout his innings.
I have this problem with tight offside calls and VAR. But that's for another dayIt's because impact has to be manually chosen as a specific frame by an operator and there can be uncertainty if the actual impact was between frames and there's been interaction between the pad and ball.
Yeah probably go through us with ease,after all we give you wickets like Christmas presentsMurph on. This will be good
Yeah, how do they know when it leaves the foot etc etcI have this problem with tight offside calls and VAR. But that's for another day
Once you loose Momentum of whats happen in the past,anyone under pressure on doing good, i wish ECB rested him to get Heal well for next 2 test.Bairstow confidence looked low I thought throughout his innings.
Umpires call for impact doesn't rely on anything beyond first contact though is what I assume the point was. You can still have impact occur between frames etc though, so it does make some sense to have a margin of error factored into the call.Yeah, if they get it wrong it massively diverts the ball to different angle. I've always agreed with Stokes that the Lyon not out decision @ Headingly in That Test was no way ripping like DRS said it was. It missed it clipping his front pad changing the directory.
Yeah 100%, ridiculous that they can rule offside by 0.1mm when that uncertainty existsI have this problem with tight offside calls and VAR. But that's for another day
Big ask but agree. Hopefully Woakes brings his A-gameLeast we saved the follow on yesterday
Got to get within 50 minimum.
Yeah, that is right it's just the ICC constantly say it is purely about umpires still being the Pharaoh of the game. It's a bit conspiratorial of me, but as soon as you admit there is margin for error you open yourself up to criticism so just leveraging crickets inherent pomposity is an easier sell.Umpires call for impact doesn't rely on anything beyond first contact though is what I assume the point was. You can still have impact occur between frames etc though, so it does make some sense to have a margin of error factored into the call.