• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official Third Test at Edgbaston

Athlai

Not Terrible
Sorry, his averages are improved by having faced NZ and WIndies. He averages 30+ against India, S.Africa and Australia. That sample of 16 games you've taken also includes the horrendous averages of the WIndies and NZ bowlers. It's no wonder the average is 38. Yes, Anderson is better than them, but don't exaggerate it to the point where you are saying by being 10 better in that selective sample - where he plays NZ and WIndies in 3/6 series (9/16 tests) - that he deserves to rated ahead of Clark or deserved of those other erroneous praises you give him.

P.S. I agree, using stats in proper context and intelligently is a very helpful guide.
Eh? NZ had good averages IIRC
 

pasag

RTDAS
If Australia escape here, I think they'll be in a pretty good position to retain the Ashes. Hussey and Johnson back in form, Watson playing well at the top of the order, Lee and possibly Clark back for Headingly. England need to get a win.
Biggest thing in Aus's favour is the possibility of no Fred which as usual throws the side out of whack. If they go the extra bat there'll be nowhere to hide for Broad or Harmison not to mention you've lost your best bowler, if they play Broad at 7 the batting looks paper thin, especially with Bell and Bopara in there. Win today and it doesn't matter.
 

Jakester1288

International Regular
If North fails now, IMO Watson should move to 6, Hughes coming back in to open again.

I'm all for Watson batting at 6 for Australia, and bowling the few odd overs. Opening, or bowling more than 15 overs per day, if a big no no. Whilst he has performed decently once, I don't think that he is up to it. If he goes on and makes a ton, and a couple more fifties, before this series is out, I still won't be convinced. When he backs it up with consistency after a couple of series, then I will be sold that he is a genuine opening option in the longer form.
 

GIMH

Norwood's on Fire
Wouldn't be surprised. Even though we have the stronger lower order, your tail has wagged okay so far
 

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
I feel somewhat diminished after reading the posts in this thread over the last 24 hrs:wacko:

As a newbie I am curious if Richard and Ikki are indeed the same person ?
Do they argue between themselves:ph34r::
why didn't any of us think of that before? :p



But no, they are not... And while they may hold onto their opinions rather passionately, they are actually pretty nice blokes to talk cricket to. And welcome to the forums, btw.. :)
 

Jewels

Cricket Spectator
Jewes - no insults thanks. Any more and you could be banned.
yeah I know. I moderate on some very parochial automotive sites .

Some people get suspended...... others you know the drill.

Seems there's some Koalas on here

Just taking the p*ss. no intent

A bit like Mitchell Johnsons bowling. Innocuous at best LOL
 
Last edited:

FaaipDeOiad

Hall of Fame Member
Cricinfo commentary shtick usually annoys me, but I thought this was pretty funny.

59.2
Onions to Clarke, FOUR, oh that's a disgracefully brilliant cover-drive. That's the sort of stroke which'll make all the other cover-drives feel rubbish about themselves. Glorious from Clarke
 

pasag

RTDAS
Pitch looking placid, no swing, ball is old - will be pretty disappointed if anyone gets out to these two in the next half hour.
 

Top