TBF, her serve is just a thing to get it in court really.Erani serving for the match against Serena. 30-15 up. Does she win?
Nope.
I kind of admire her being a top 20 player so long without a serve, but if she won a slam it would be pretty embarrassing, but that's not going to happen. Even though famously she made a final before being crushed.haha it is indeed ridiculous
lol. What was up with no Petko in the first rubbers?Looks like Germany are going to pull it back to 2-2, going with the brilliant tactic of playing your best players. Revolutionary, hope it doesn't catch on.
No-one knows, Rittner said it was jet-lag and the other 2 had turned up earlier. Umm, yes they did that because they were knocked out of the previous tournament, because they're not as good, Barbara. As much as I love Julia, for umm reasons, I'd have a Petko who hadn't slept for a week over her, I'm afraid. Lisicki's shown some form recently, but on clay? Still she nearly won, but that just shows how poor Pavs has been playing recently, and she looks really out of shape. Wasted talent there. She's such a great ball-striker.lol. What was up with no Petko in the first rubbers?
Nothing wrong with the current standard of the women's game, they're stronger, fitter and in general hit the ball so much harder. This anti-evolutionary view in any sport kind of annoys me.Really hoping that at least one of Robson or Watson can be free of illness and injury. They both have semi-final possibilities in the current standard of the women's game if they can drag their fragile frames onto the court regularly.
This is a remarkable because he won the first five he played in 2011 but missed Monte Carlo through injury. Also moves level with Roger for 1000 titles, just 4 behind Nadal now.Meanwhile he's made history by being the first ever player to win the first 3 Masters 1000s back to back to back. FREAK
In the last couple of years I can only think of Bartoli, there's always been odd winners on occasions, Martinez, Majoli, and let's not talk about the 70s mess.There's been a lot of less than great players winning Grand Slams in recent years. It's not a bad thing and preferable to the same two players winning everything, but there are holes there for a talented player like Robson (and I also believe Watson) to fill. They're not alone by any means. Madison Keys has all the shots............and a decent pair of knockers.
I was thinking along the lines of Schiavone. Li Na and Stosur all this decade. These days the girls aren't allowed on the tour at 14/15 so they mature later and (hopefully) last longer. One of the great disappointment of my tennis following years was the premature demise of Austin and Jaegar which left Navratilova and Evert playing in (what seemed like) every Grand Slam final.In the last couple of years I can only think of Bartoli
Well I think Li Na was good in the end. Yet we're in agreement on this largely, early burn-out of players was so frustrating back then, and it did leave the fields rather weak for those big beasts. More people competing until later in their careers can only be a good thing. It happened in Mens tennis as well really, Becker, Chang, Edberg, Wilander, Courier all stopped winning around mid-twenties (Beckers oz Open win a bit of an anomaly after prodigious starts.I was thinking along the lines of Schiavone. Li Na and Stosur all this decade. These days the girls aren't allowed on the tour at 14/15 so they mature later and (hopefully) last longer. One of the great disappointment of my tennis following years was the premature demise of Austin and Jaegar which left Navratilova and Evert playing in (what seemed like) every Grand Slam final.