Nah, sorry, the last few years have been better, but the French was a snooze for a bit, apart from Soderling. I'm not talking about the other slams, just the French, the others have been hugely competitive between the 4. Some truly classic matches too.Depends what your idea of competitive is. Sure there have only been four realistic winners of a GS in the last decade but every one of them has been really competitive among the elite few in the last 4/5 years, even the French.
Novak was favourite all tournament until the final when the market jumped on Rafa ftr. Lot of articles written following the final saying everyone was wrong to doubt Rafa heading in.There where some good matches along the way. Yet it just seemed to click on to the inevitable finish.
depends on how serena plays…it's like nadal and federer, regardless of each other's form coming into the match, serena will always win...Can Mr Sharapova win Wimbledon, looked bloody awesome today.
Hahaha. Anil, Mr Sharapova = Grigor Dimitrov.depends on how serena plays…it's like nadal and federer, regardless of each other's form coming into the match, serena will always win...
oops never mind…didn't know that dimitrov was her boyfriend…anyway i don't see anyone out of the big 4 winning wimbledon...Hahaha. Anil, Mr Sharapova = Grigor Dimitrov.
This is a very annoying media/average person narrative, yes.Cool tennis exists for the only two weeks in this country most of us acknowledge. yay
Hey the daily Mail have just realised Halep used to have great **** but doesn't now, so we need Wimbledon to catch up.This is a very annoying media/average person narrative, yes.