Don't like England in those situation, like needing 20 off 2 overs.Could just as easily say it t'other way round though - we could do with keeping wickets in hand in case the run rate slips. Either would be good.
Surprised that England are favourites. Long way to go still.
Oh, a very quick edit there, personally I didn't reply to you, because the ****e-ness of your post picking an argument over nothing was there for all to see.Yeah, it was targetted at Grecian,but really didn't want to get into a debate with GF about What Grecian implied with that post,where it was most likely going to head .
My understanding of that post was that he was expressing Joy that Munaf had gotten injured,but if he wasn't he could have replies saying so and it would have been fair enough.He responded fairly in a different way though.
Haha pretty harsh considerating the match situation. When you need 8.3rpo, you're going to lose wickets. It's just the nature of such a chase. He played a good innings in the circumstances here.It may be a bit unfair but I'm getting a bit sick of this from Bell, it's like the same innings over and over.
It's coming. It's now 26 off 20, as opposed to 26 off 40. Besides, if Ravi and Patel are still in the side, it's not Bell who's the problem.It may be a bit unfair but I'm getting a bit sick of this from Bell, it's like the same innings over and over.
It's not at all unfair to expect as experienced a player as Bell to engage his brain in these games.It may be a bit unfair but I'm getting a bit sick of this from Bell, it's like the same innings over and over.