honestbharani
Whatever it takes!!!
Kallis' record against Australia is not better, IIRC.Prince EWS said:The fact that Kallis' record is better than Lara's completely shoots down that arguement.
Kallis' record against Australia is not better, IIRC.Prince EWS said:The fact that Kallis' record is better than Lara's completely shoots down that arguement.
Oops, I thought the MOM call was the MOS announcement (in my defence, I was fighting with my son for the remote control. ).SirBloody Idiot said:Man of the one day series is Gilchrist.
Lara 10818 runs, 30 100's, 46 50's, 54.09
The fact that Kallis' record is better than Lara's completely shoots down that arguement.
I didn't think my comment was particularly harsh - I was recommending he get Man of the Series, and I only said he didn't do a whole lot in the second game (not batting and taking 1/56).Top_Cat said:Harsh, man. He didn't get a bat and took a pivotal wicket. He didn't excell, true, but he was okay.
I didnt say it was better by a large amount.Top_Cat said:Lara 10818 runs, 30 100's, 46 50's, 54.09
Kallis 7337 runs, 22 100's, 37 50's, ave 56.87
Only his average is better and it's by the MASSIVE difference of 2.78 runs.
Against Australia
Lara 2470 runs, 8 100's, 11 50's, ave 51.45
Kallis 685 runs, 1 100, 4 50's, ave 32.61
He didnt say "against Australia" though.Kallis' record against Australia is not better, IIRC.
Ah okay. That 1-fer was a BIG 1-fer, though.I didn't think my comment was particularly harsh - I was recommending he get Man of the Series, and I only said he didn't do a whole lot in the second game (not batting and taking 1/56).
I can accept that its a matter of opinion, but I cant accept that Lara is simply better hands down.honestbharani said:that is your opinion. Against Australia, Kallis won't even come close, for me.
If you took away the not outs from Kallis's record I wonder if his average would look quite so healthy! He has to be the most selfish of the leading batters currently playing. Wonderful talent & all, but I find it v hard to warm to the bloke.Top_Cat said:Lara 10818 runs, 30 100's, 46 50's, 54.09
Kallis 7337 runs, 22 100's, 37 50's, ave 56.87
Only his average is better and it's by the MASSIVE difference of 2.78 runs.
Against Australia
Lara 2470 runs, 8 100's, 11 50's, ave 51.45
Kallis 685 runs, 1 100, 4 50's, ave 32.61
Oh, let's be honest - many of us just can't stand the man - I know I can't.BoyBrumby said:If you took away the not outs from Kallis's record I wonder if his average would look quite so healthy! He has to be the most selfish of the leading batters currently playing. Wonderful talent & all, but I find it v hard to warm to the bloke.
What drugs are you on?tooextracool said:i dont see the relationship between 'not putting 100% in' and 'regaining form'.
and you can call it whatever you want, the fact is that flintoff has underperformed immensely this series. and i dont see how the aussies should be dissapointed with their scheduling during the summer, given that it all played right into their hands and they got way too much practice before the first ashes test began.
and if you think katich and gilchrist have improved as players since then you're obviously deluding yourself.
Not to mention he's really excelled by eliminated most risks out of his play, limited his strokes to the V and square of the wicket. Considering all the risks Lara takes with his style of batting, it's amazing he averages near 55.If you took away the not outs from Kallis's record I wonder if his average would look quite so healthy! He has to be the most selfish of the leading batters currently playing. Wonderful talent & all, but I find it v hard to warm to the bloke.
LOL - I'll have to rifle through the stats book and compare it to the great 1-fors.Top_Cat said:Ah okay. That 1-fer was a BIG 1-fer, though.
)OHH Youve seen this movie before.....lolDemolition Man said:Dont see the point of having slips with the line they are bowling.
Edit-- a slip is moved.
Watson's selection is based purely on potential.tooextracool said:oh no i dont deny that watson will never develop into anything as a bowler. i do however maintain that he is very very poor with the bal ATM, and as such does not merit selection in the side as a bowling or any type of all rounder.
if its a turner i'd drop Ahktar for Harmisonmarc71178 said:Looking at the 14, I'd say they'll have to play:
Smith
Sehwag
Dravid
Lara
Kallis
Flintoff
Boucher
Pollock
Vettori
Akhtar
Muralitharan.
For me, that's only really 2 spots out from the team that should be there, and in a way the batting wouldn't be any stronger if you substitute the 2 in, but the keeping would be a lot stronger.
James, I dont know if it is the green or is it Black tape your refering to ,If it is the black ,all the players have them on as a mark of respect from whats happened this morning over in Pakistan/India. Anyone reading this from around that area ,our thoughts are with you all ,Just be strong is all i can say and good luck ,you have the rest of the world praying for you allJames90 said:What's with the bit of green tape on the Australians sleeve? Are they covering up an advertisement?
I wrote the damm movie !jlo33692 said:)OHH Youve seen this movie before.....lol