most of them got out trying to play rash shots. it was a 20/20.Lostman said:i always preferred 6 batsman in ODI's, but consdering that SL got bowled out in a 20/20
i would gladly take the extra batsmen instead of the bowler.
From what I heard he was very impressive, bowling with good swing and pace. His average speed was around 140 k's with a quicker one at 145, so not quite Bond pace, but certainly very sharp. He also got the ball to move both ways, and almost had Sangakkara with a beauty. If his knee isn't buggered, I wouldn't mind seeing him partnered with Bond to open later in the series.Matt52 said:I was wondering how Gillespie went. Cricinfo said he went OK and had a run rate of only 4 . something so seems he did well. What did you guys think. I havent actually seen him play, I think ever?
I disagree. McCullum doesn't have much experience opening the batting in one-day domestic games, let alone internationals. Even if he plays out the first 10 overs, what is he going to do then? He has no experience batting through an innings, no real experience working the ball around. He does, however, have experience in making quick-fire 30s and 40s, which is what we've seen throughout his career.dinu23 said:the loss of Flemming weakens the kiwi batting lineup considerably IMO. the only batsman that can pose a threat is McCullum.
Of all your remaining batsmen, I actually think James Franklin played Murali the best in the test series. But even he favoured the sweep.Sir Redman said:Actually, I have serious doubts about every single one of our batsmens' ability to play Murali. None of them have the slightest clue what to do, and it seems the only option they can think of is to sweep. Out of Murali's sixty deliveries tomorrow (presumably), I'm expecting at least 40 attempted sweeps, from which the best result we can hope for is a single.
So that's 40 already off of him thenSir Redman said:Actually, I have serious doubts about every single one of our batsmens' ability to play Murali. None of them have the slightest clue what to do, and it seems the only option they can think of is to sweep. Out of Murali's sixty deliveries tomorrow (presumably), I'm expecting at least 40 attempted sweeps, from which the best result we can hope for is a single.
It does look a bit thin but Fleming, Styris, Oram will all come back into the side at some stage which will make the batting line-up look a lot healthier. Big chance for Ross Taylor to show his class and cement his place in the team and for some fringe players, e.g, the Marshall's, Fulton, Adams, etc to stake their claims for a spot in the side to tour Aussie for the tri-series which will be a fantastic build-up to the World Cup. A chance to humiliate England even further and test ourselves against the Aussies. Bring it on! I'm picking this to be "The Summer of Brendan McCullum"Lostman said:looking at the NZ batting lineup the only batsmen that worry me as of right now are McCullum and Vettori. With Astle opening with McCullum, the NZ middle and lower order does look pretty brittle in my opinion. Plus in all likelyhood SL's spinners are going to be bowling at them in the middle overs. (murali, jayasuriya, dilshan)
Adams is a bit of a jack of all trades, master of noneNatman20 said:I was very suprised to see Mason bowl well in the Twenty20. I think he has more potential than I ever thought he had or it could just be the pitch. I would have either Gillespie or Mason in for Franklin and keep Kyle Mills in the ODI squad for the World Cup. The Twenty20 batting line-up was shocking IMO. The tail enders started at 5 IMO. Adams is no allrounder IMO.