Ming said:I wouldn't label Oram as a batting allrounder. In ODIs, he's very much a front line paceman but in Tests his batting is more useful thanhis bowling. Will be interesting to see how Bracewell uses him in the Tests this year.
To be fair though, isn't Oram's batting record in ODI's a bit rubbish?James said:Replacing Oram (an batting all-rounder) with Chris Martin. That seems very strange if you ask me.
To be fair to who?marc71178 said:To be fair though
what article?Loony BoB said:Just reading the Cricinfo articles - what's all this about Marshall handling the ball?
This one?dinu23 said:what article?
"To be fair though", 1034 runs at 18.46 is a lot better than 6 runs at 1.5...marc71178 said:To be fair though, isn't Oram's batting record in ODI's a bit rubbish?
TT Boy said:
I actually rate Oram's batting higher than his bowling. He doesn't have the best batting record as Voltman said, but remember he generally comes in at Number 7 and doesn't get the batting opportunities others up the order get. This is backed up by his batting record in test cricket.marc71178 said:To be fair though, isn't Oram's batting record in ODI's a bit rubbish?
A CW member named after an adult film star... interesting.TT Boy said:
Voltman said:A CW member named after an adult film star... interesting.
Sri Lanka have to win both the games to level the series
Players and Umpires are in the middle
Play is about to start