Crickinfo is quite slow, it still reflects 498/9shaka said:all out now, Martin takes the catch, Franklin gets four wickets as well
Crickinfo is quite slow, it still reflects 498/9shaka said:all out now, Martin takes the catch, Franklin gets four wickets as well
Because I thought that the Black Caps were batting extremely well (for a change)... In fact, it was just that the pitch was so damn flat and boring!chipmonk said:How come you didn't seem so bored when NZ were batting?
They're talking about the pitch being timeless test match material.The Maestro said:WTF to Franklin....waits till the opposition has a massive total then he goes nuts and gets 4 wickets, no wonder his average seems disproportionally good compared to his performances
I'm not watching so whats the wicket doing? anything? Still a road huh.
Flag declaring, if NZ did that SL have some very destructive batsmen who could go at 6+ per over in a canter . Then as soon/if they lost a few wickets they would simply stonewall to the draw. Cant see how a declaration /run chase could work for NZ here. Fleming will just set an impossible target and this game will grind out to a draw
2nd test/Green Top/Lets duke it out!
hey Chipmunk is that all you got? Move along son yo outta yo league fo real
chaminda_00 said:I still think their is a chance of a result if the Kiwi openers and some of the other Kiwi batsmen didn't bat so slowly. New Zealand scored at 3.5 and we scored at nearly 4 with Atapattu scoring a century, one of the slwoest batters in the world. The Kiwis scored too slowly on the first day and if they didn't then there would still be a chance of a result, but now we have to how for some sporting declaration and no rain.
If you take out a couple of batsmen, they both batted slow TBH.psxpro said:Yup its always NZ who bats slow?
Srilanka batted at a slower rate overall didn't they and that from being in total control at 353/3.
I would like a good pitch but if there is choice between this and the pitches vs india in 2003 i'd take the pitches vs india any day.
Good fightback from NZ, Was suprised we bowled them out for 498, but as I saifd the srilankan tail is a bit long.
It will still be a draw.
chaminda_00 said:If you take out a couple of batsmen, they both batted slow TBH.
Well if you look at FC averages then our tail isn't that long, but they had a bad day.
Well the pitches are too bowler friendly, but it is probably a bit below NZ. We have this new FC competition where the top players a split into 4 sides and that probably as strong as NZ if not stronger, it needs to be expanded but.Blaze said:How strong is your FC cricket though?
chaminda_00 said:Well the pitches are too bowler friendly, but it is probably a bit below NZ. We have this new FC competition where the top players a split into 4 sides and that probably as strong as NZ if not stronger, it needs to be expanded but.
The standard is not that high in the Priemer League, but the Inter-Province is quite highBlaze said:It cant be that flash then because NZ domestic cricket at the moment is a joke.
The standard is terrible
Cumming most be a white ChopraRight arm fast said:i wish the kiwis would start playing a few more shots im bored
Right arm fast said:i wish the kiwis would start playing a few more shots im bored
Well Vincent isn't established and he play a lot more shots, also so did Hamish when he startedBlaze said:U cant really blame the two openers though.. they are not established in the team so therefore don't want to risk getting out
chaminda_00 said:Well Vincent isn't established and he play a lot more shots, also so did Hamish when he started
But two an over, that is too slow in anyones books. If you look at Sri Lanka's two slowest batsmen Atapattu and Thilan they go at 40 S/R.Blaze said:Different type of players though arent they