No it isn't. There is a confidence interval for prediction, and what we see is the averaged predicted path of the ball. So uncertainities of prediction is additive.that's stupid. if a ball is hitting half the wicket, it's out.
If a ball lands half inside the line of leg stump, it's out.
These things are yes/no answers, they're not additive.
He should be bowling more. Either it should be 130-135k short bursts, hitting the pitch hard and hitting the bats hard. Or he has to bowl 125kish and long tight spells. At the moment he is in between and it's not helping Sri Lanka.Mathews is Sri Lanka's second best fast bowler after Eranga. He can actually hit the spot 6 out of 6 and get a bit of movement when conditions suit. I was surprised he didn't bowl more than he did in England since England should suit him. He was good whenever he did bowl.
Haha was about to say. Very silly review that.Review level: Watson
Took three wickets and was the only bowler with an econ below 4rpo. Bit harsh to say he was "not helping".He should be bowling more. Either it should be 130-135k short bursts, hitting the pitch hard and hitting the bats hard. Or he has to bowl 125kish and long tight spells. At the moment he is in between and it's not helping Sri Lanka.